ArticleMicrobiologyOpen2020
The day-to-day stability of the ruminal and fecal microbiota in lactating dairy cows.
Article in MicrobiologyOpen, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 34 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
34 citing papers in PubMed.
- Posture and location preferences and gastrointestinal homeostasis in Holstein cows with tongue-rolling behavior.BMC veterinary research · 2026Article
- Article
- Effect of Roughage Source on the Composition and Colonization of Rumen Bacteria and Methanogens in Dumont and Mongolian Sheep.Animals : an open access journal from MDPI · 2025Article
- Supplementation of lentinan improves lactation performance by altering ruminal microorganisms and metabolites in dairy cows.Animal nutrition (Zhongguo xu mu shou yi xue hui) · 2025Article
- Fecal Microbiota and Performance of Dairy Cattle from a West Mexican Family Dairy Farm Supplemented with a Fiber-Degrading Enzymatic Complex.Veterinary sciences · 2025Article
- Temporal changes in ruminal microbiota composition and diversity in dairy cows supplemented with aFrontiers in veterinary science · 2025Article
- Interactive effects of dietary protein and fiber levels on total tract and apparent ileal nutrient digestibility, microbiota profiling, and fermentation products in pigs fed a blend of branched-chain volatile fatty acids.Frontiers in veterinary science · 2025Article
- Effects ofAnimals : an open access journal from MDPI · 2024Article
- Sex-Induced Changes in Microbial Eukaryotes and Prokaryotes in Gastrointestinal Tract of Simmental Cattle.Biology · 2024Article
- Gut Microbiota Diversity of Local Egyptian Cattle Managed in Different Ecosystems.Animals : an open access journal from MDPI · 2024Article
- The Adaptive Alternation of Intestinal Microbiota and Regulation of Host Genes Jointly Promote Pigs to Digest Appropriate High-Fiber Diets.Animals : an open access journal from MDPI · 2024Article
- Linking growth performance and carcass traits with enterotypes in Muscovy ducks.Animal bioscience · 2024Article
- Comparative Analysis of the Effect of Dietary Supplementation with Fermented and Water-Extracted Leaf Extracts ofFoods (Basel, Switzerland) · 2024Article
- Turicibacterales protect mice from severeInfection and immunity · 2023Article
- Analysis of Fecal Microbial Changes in Young Calves Following Bovine Rotavirus Infection.Veterinary sciences · 2023Article
- The 16S rDNA high-throughput sequencing correlation analysis of milk and gut microbial communities in mastitis Holstein cows.BMC microbiology · 2023Article
- Gut microbiota Turicibacter strains differentially modify bile acids and host lipids.Nature communications · 2023Article
- Article
- Dietary spirulina supplementation modifies rumen development, fermentation and bacteria composition in Hu sheep when consuming high-fat dietary.Frontiers in veterinary science · 2023Article
- Altered Fecal Microbiome and Correlations of the Metabolome with Plasma Metabolites in Dairy Cows with Left Displaced Abomasum.Microbiology spectrum · 2022Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
8 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
In this study, we examined differences between the microbiota of the ruminal fluid (DR) and feces (DF) from five lactating dairy cows over three consecutive days using 16S rRNA gene sequence-based analysis. Results showed significant differences between the microbial communities of the DR and DF. In particular, the relative abundance of the phyla Firmicutes and Actinobacteria was significantly lower (q < 0.001) in DR compared with DF, while the relative abundance of Bacteroidetes was significantly higher in DF than that of DR (q < 0.001). A significantly higher relative abundance of the genera Bifidobacterium, 5-7N15, Clostridium, Epulopiscium, SMB53, Turicibacter, Dorea, Roseburia, and Akkermansia was observed in the DF, while a higher relative abundance of the genera Prevotella, Butyrivibrio, CF231, RFN20, and Succiniclasticum was observed in the DR. A further analysis using the functional prediction program PICRUSt showed that sequences belonging to the 5-7N15, Akkermansia, Bifidobacterium, Clostridium, Dorea, Epulopiscium, Roseburia, and Turicibacter were significantly and positively correlated with glycan biosynthesis and metabolism, while CF231, Prevotella, RFN20, and Succiniclasticum were significantly and positively correlated with amino acid, lipid, carbohydrate, other amino acid, cofactors, and vitamins metabolism. No significant differences were observed across the three consecutive days in either the DR or DF ecosystems, with no significant differences in the diversity or abundance at the phylum and genus levels suggested that there is a limited day-to-day variability in the gut microbiota.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.