Evidence map›Paper›PMID 32175447›Full record

ArticleArchives animal breeding2018

Evaluation of chromosomal instability in somatic cells of farmed foxes.

Olga Szeleszczuk, Magdalena Gleindek, Anna Grzesiakowska, Marta Kuchta-Gładysz, Agnieszka Otwinowska-Mindur

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Archives animal breeding, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
0.1field-weighted citation impact, top 56% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed, 2 citations in OpenAlex.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Olga SzeleszczukDepartment of Animal Anatomy, Institute of Veterinary Sciences, University of Agriculture in Krakow, Krakow 30-059, Poland.
Magdalena GleindekDepartment of Animal Anatomy, Institute of Veterinary Sciences, University of Agriculture in Krakow, Krakow 30-059, Poland.
Anna GrzesiakowskaDepartment of Animal Anatomy, Institute of Veterinary Sciences, University of Agriculture in Krakow, Krakow 30-059, Poland.
Marta Kuchta-GładyszDepartment of Animal Anatomy, Institute of Veterinary Sciences, University of Agriculture in Krakow, Krakow 30-059, Poland.
Agnieszka Otwinowska-MindurDepartment of Genetics and Animal Breeding, Faculty of Animal Science, University of Agriculture in Krakow, Krakow 30-059, Poland.
University of Agriculture in Krakow · PL

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The micronucleus (MN) test is a common tool used to evaluate cellular genetic instability at the chromosomal level. It determines the effect of physical, chemical and environmental factors on DNA, and thus the body's individual resistance to harmful substances. The karyotypes of blue and silver foxes and their interspecific hybrids are characterized by morphological and structural variation. This variation is partly attributable to the presence of chromosomal polymorphism, which may significantly influence the stability of genetic material in the cells of these species. The objective of the study was to evaluate genetic material stability in selected Canidae species. To this end, analyses using the MN test were performed. Binucleated cells (BNCs) were analysed in microscopic preparations, and the number of micronuclei was determined within these cells. For the proportions of both MN and BNCs, highly significant differences were observed between the fox species. The interspecific hybrids differed from the other fox species in MN percentage. The lowest average was noted in blue foxes (3.33) and the highest in interspecific hybrids (15.21).

Identifiers

PMID32175447
PMCPMC7065389
OpenAlexW2898999909

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.