Evidence map›Paper›PMID 32175445›Full record

ArticleArchives animal breeding2018

Development of amplified fragment length polymorphism (AFLP) markers for the identification of Cholistani cattle.

Muhammad Haseeb Malik, Muhammad Moaeen-Ud-Din, Ghulam Bilal, Abdul Ghaffar, Raja Danish Muner, Ghazala Kaukab Raja, Waqas Ahmad Khan

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Archives animal breeding, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Review
  2. An overview of remote monitoring methods in biodiversity conservation.Environmental science and pollution research international · 2022
    Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors.

Muhammad Haseeb MalikUniversity Institute of Biochemistry & Biotechnology, PMAS Arid Agriculture University, Rawalpindi, 46300, Pakistan.
Muhammad Moaeen-Ud-DinNational Center for Livestock Breeding, Genetics & Genomics, PMAS Arid Agriculture University, Rawalpindi, 46300, Pakistan.
Ghulam BilalDepartment of Animal Breeding & Genetics, Faculty of Veterinary & Animal Sciences, PMAS Arid Agriculture University, Rawalpindi, 46300, Pakistan.
Abdul GhaffarAnimal Science Institute, National Agriculture Research Council, Islamabad, Pakistan.
Raja Danish MunerDepartment of Animal Breeding & Genetics, Faculty of Veterinary & Animal Sciences, PMAS Arid Agriculture University, Rawalpindi, 46300, Pakistan.
Ghazala Kaukab RajaUniversity Institute of Biochemistry & Biotechnology, PMAS Arid Agriculture University, Rawalpindi, 46300, Pakistan.
Waqas Ahmad KhanDepartment of Biotechnology, Faculty of Sciences, University of Sargodha, Sargodha, Pakistan.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The identification issue of livestock can be resolved by using molecular identification tools that are acceptable to preserve and maintain pure breeds worldwide. The application of a molecular identification methodology is more important for developing nations, e.g., Pakistan, where uncontrolled crossbreeding has become a common practice and the import of exotic animals and germplasm is ever increasing. This presents a risk to local breeds as also stated by the FAO. Therefore, the current study was designed to develop standard molecular markers for Cholistani cattle to ascertain their purity for breeding purpose. In this study 50 and 48 unrelated males were sampled for Cholistani and each crossbred cattle, respectively. Candidate molecular markers present in Cholistani but absent in crossbred cattle and vice versa were detected using the amplified fragment length polymorphism (AFLP) method. Eleven markers were developed and were converted to single nucleotide polymorphism (SNP) markers for genotyping. The allele frequencies in both breeds were determined for discrimination ability using polymerase-chain-reaction-restriction-fragment-polymorphism (PCR-AFLP). The probability of identifying the Cholistani breed was 0.905 and the probability of misjudgment was 0.073 using a panel of markers. The identified markers can ascertain the breed purity and are likely to extend the facility for breed purity testing before entering into a genetic improvement program in the country.

Identifiers

PMID32175445
PMCPMC7065403

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.