ArticleAnnals of translational medicine2020
Impact of the use of vasoactive drugs in cardiac death donors on the early postoperative renal function and related complications in renal transplant recipients.
Article in Annals of translational medicine, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed, 4 citations in OpenAlex.
- How does damage control strategy influence organ's suitability for donation after major trauma? A multi-institutional study.European journal of trauma and emergency surgery : official publication of the European Trauma Society · 2024Article
- Dynamic changes of neutrophil-to-lymphocyte ratio in brain-dead donors and delayed graft function in kidney transplant recipients.Renal failure · 2022Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
19 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundTo explore the impact of the use of vasoactive drugs in donation after cardiac death (DCD) donors on graft function, with an attempt to guide the clinical practices of organ preservation and DCD kidney transplantation.
methodsThe clinical data of 187 DCD donors and 304 recipients who were operated on in our center from February 2018 to May 2019 were retrospectively analyzed. Based on whether vasoactive drugs were used for maintaining blood pressure in DCD donors, the renal donors and recipients were divided into a high-dose group (norepinephrine ≥1.3 µg/kg/min or in combination with dopamine), a low-dose group (norepinephrine <1.3 µg/kg/min or in conjunction with dopamine), and a no-medication group (without the use of vasoactive drugs). The clinical features, post-transplant renal function, and complications were compared among these three groups.
resultsThe early renal function 1 and 7 days after surgery was significantly superior in the high-dose group and no-medication group (P<0.05) but showed no significant difference between the low-dose group and the no-medication group (P>0.05). Blood urea nitrogen (BUN) on the 1st postoperative days was significantly higher in the high-dose group than in the low-dose group and the no-medication group (P<0.05). Renal function indicators, including serum creatinine (CRE), BUN, and blood uric acid (UA) on the 30th postoperative day, showed no significant difference among these three groups (P>0.05). The incidence of delayed graft function (DGF) after renal transplantation was significantly higher in the high-dose group than in the low-dose group and the no-medication group (P<0.05), whereas there was no significant difference between the groups in the incidences of graft rejection and infections (P>0.05).
conclusionsThe use of vasoactive drugs in DCD donors can affect the early recovery of renal function in renal transplant recipients, particularly for those donors who are administered a high dose of vasoactive drugs. Therefore, donor maintenance should be performed cautiously with vasoactive drugs.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.