ReviewFrontiers in pediatrics2020
The Extremely Preterm Infant: Ethical Considerations in Life-and-Death Decision-Making.
Review in Frontiers in pediatrics, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 18 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
18 citing papers in PubMed, 32 citations in OpenAlex.
- At the edge of viability: neonatologists' moral experience under uncertainty in Türkiye.BMC medical ethics · 2026Article
- Early Outcomes and Associated Factors in Neonates with Extremely Low Birth Weight Admitted to the Neonatal Intensive Care Unit at Selected Referral Hospitals in Kigali.Rwanda journal of medicine and health sciences · 2026Article
- Neonatal Esophageal Perforation: A Comprehensive Review of the Literature.Journal of clinical medicine · 2026Review
- Iatrogenic esophageal perforation in extremely preterm newborn with multiple comorbidities: case report and ethical considerations.Frontiers in pediatrics · 2026Article
- Developing and validating an explainable digital mortality prediction tool for extremely preterm infants.PLOS digital health · 2025Article
- Congenital and Neonatal Skin Disorders: Histopathological Diagnosis and Syndromic Associations.Cureus · 2025Review
- Uncertainties in the NICU: a scoping review to inform a tailored taxonomy.Journal of perinatology : official journal of the California Perinatal Association · 2025Article
- At the threshold of viability: to resuscitate or not to resuscitate - the perspectives of Israeli neonatologists.BMJ paediatrics open · 2024Article
- The Ethics and Practice of Periviability Care.Children (Basel, Switzerland) · 2024Article
- Changes in perinatal management and outcomes of extremely preterm infants born below 26 weeks of gestation in a tertiary referral hospital in Sweden: Comparison between 2004-2007 and 2012-2016.Acta obstetricia et gynecologica Scandinavica · 2023Article
- Uncertainty and probability in neonatal end-of-life decision-making: analysing real-time conversations between healthcare professionals and families of critically ill newborns.BMC palliative care · 2023Article
- End-of-life decision-making in the neonatal intensive care unit.Frontiers in pediatrics · 2023Review
- New Challenges with Treatment Advances in Newborn Infants with Genetic Disorders and Severe Congenital Malformations.Children (Basel, Switzerland) · 2022Review
- Digital decision aid for prenatal counseling in imminent extreme premature labor: development and pilot testing.BMC medical informatics and decision making · 2022Article
- Decision-making in imminent extreme premature births: perceived shared decision-making, parental decisional conflict and decision regret.Journal of perinatology : official journal of the California Perinatal Association · 2021Article
- Music Is Life-Follow-Up Qualitative Study on Parental Experiences of Creative Music Therapy in the Neonatal Period.International journal of environmental research and public health · 2021Article
- Micro-premature infants in New Jersey show improved mortality and morbidity from 2000-2018.Journal of neonatal-perinatal medicine · 2021Article
- Challenges of acute peritoneal dialysis in extremely-low-birth-weight infants: a retrospective cohort study.BMC nephrology · 2020Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
1 author at 1 institution in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Care of the preterm infant has improved tremendously over the last 60 years, with attendant improvement in outcomes. For the extremely preterm infant, <28 weeks' gestation, concerns related to survival as well as neurodevelopmental impairment, have influenced decision-making to a much larger extent than seen in older children. Possible reasons for conferring a different status on extremely preterm infants include: (1) the belief that the brain is a privileged organ, (2) the degree of medical uncertainty in terms of outcomes, (3) the fact that the family will deal with the psychological, emotional, physical, and financial consequences of treatment decisions, (4) that the extremely preterm looks more like a fetus than a term newborn, (5) the initial lack of relational identity, (6) the fact that extremely preterm infants are technology-dependent, and (7) the timing of decision-making around delivery. Treating extremely preterm infants differently does not hold up to scrutiny. They are owed the same respect as other pediatric patients, in terms of personhood, and we have the same duties to care for them. However, the degree of medical uncertainty and the fact that parents will deal with the consequences of decision-making, highlights the importance of providing a wide band of discretion in parental decision-making authority. Ethical principles considered in decision-making include best interest (historically the sine qua non of pediatric decision-making), a reasonable person standard, the "good enough" parent, and the harm principle, the latter two being more pragmatic. To operationalize these principles, potential models for decision-making are the Zone of Parental Discretion, the Not Unreasonable Standard, and a Shared Decision-Making model. In the final analysis shared decision-making with a wide zone of parental discretion, which is based on the harm principle, would provide fair and equitable decision-making for the extremely preterm infant. However, in the rare circumstance where parents do not wish to embark upon intensive care, against medical recommendations, it would be most helpful to develop local guidelines both for support of health care practitioners and to provide consistency of care for extremely preterm infants.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.