Evidence map›Paper›PMID 32175247›Full record

ReviewGland surgery2020

European perspective on the use of molecular tests in the diagnosis and therapy of thyroid neoplasms.

Małgorzata Oczko-Wojciechowska, Agnieszka Kotecka-Blicharz, Jolanta Krajewska, Dagmara Rusinek, Marcin Barczyński, Barbara Jarząb, Agnieszka Czarniecka

Open access · diamondAbstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Gland surgery, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 12 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
12citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
2.4field-weighted citation impact, top 10% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

12 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 26 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Focal Thyroid Incidentalomas onFrontiers in endocrinology · 2021
    Pooled it
  2. Trial
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Review
  6. Review
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Novel Inhibitor-Based Therapies for Thyroid Cancer-An Update.International journal of molecular sciences · 2021
    Review
  12. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Małgorzata Oczko-WojciechowskaDepartment of Nuclear Medicine and Endocrine Oncology, Laboratory of Molecular Diagnostic and Functional Genomics, Maria Sklodowska-Curie Institute-Oncology Center, Gliwice Branch, Gliwice, Poland.
Agnieszka Kotecka-BlicharzDepartment of Nuclear Medicine and Endocrine Oncology, Maria Sklodowska-Curie Institute-Oncology Center, Gliwice Branch, Gliwice, Poland.
Jolanta KrajewskaDepartment of Nuclear Medicine and Endocrine Oncology, Maria Sklodowska-Curie Institute-Oncology Center, Gliwice Branch, Gliwice, Poland.
Dagmara RusinekDepartment of Nuclear Medicine and Endocrine Oncology, Laboratory of Molecular Diagnostic and Functional Genomics, Maria Sklodowska-Curie Institute-Oncology Center, Gliwice Branch, Gliwice, Poland.
Marcin BarczyńskiDepartment of Endocrine Surgery, Third Chair of General Surgery, Jagiellonian University Medical College, Kraków, Poland.
Barbara JarząbDepartment of Nuclear Medicine and Endocrine Oncology, Maria Sklodowska-Curie Institute-Oncology Center, Gliwice Branch, Gliwice, Poland.
Agnieszka CzarnieckaThe Oncologic and Reconstructive Surgery Clinic, Maria Sklodowska-Curie Institute-Oncology Center, Gliwice Branch, Gliwice, Poland.
The Maria Sklodowska-Curie National Research Institute of Oncology · PLJagiellonian University · PL

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Thyroid nodules are frequently observed, particularly in individuals of over 60 years of age. On the other hand, most of the detected changes are benign and they do not require surgery. Therefore, differentiation between benign and malignant lesions in preoperative diagnosis is of crucial importance. Currently, the use of fine-needle aspiration biopsy (FNAB) and cytological assessment are the gold standard in the diagnosis of thyroid nodules. This procedure significantly reduces the need for diagnostic surgical intervention. However, approximately 15-30% of cytological results are classified as indeterminate. This is mainly due to the lack of specific cytomorphologic features that would facilitate the diagnosis based on cell evaluation under microscopic assessment. For the diagnoses of atypia of undetermined significance/follicular lesion of undetermined significance (AUS/FLUS), the assessment of invasion is crucial. Such an evaluation is not possible in cytology. Recently, molecular tests have been developed. They improve cytological diagnosis, particularly in the case of indeterminate results. Commercially available tests are developed based on the North American population. It is important to assess whether such tests can be used in the evaluation of e.g., European population.

Indexed as

indeterminate cytologymolecular classifierThyroid nodules

Identifiers

PMID32175247
PMCPMC7044080
OpenAlexW2986317240

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.