Evidence map›Paper›PMID 32175227›Full record

ReviewCardiovascular diagnosis and therapy2020

Role of CT imaging in left atrial appendage occlusion for the WATCHMAN™ device.

Mirna Kaafarani, Jacqueline Saw, Matthew Daniels, Thomas Song, Marianne Rollet, Sanel Kesinovic, Tony Lamorgese, Kati Kubiak, Zhihua Qi, Milan Pantelic and 2 more

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Cardiovascular diagnosis and therapy, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 15 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
15citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

15 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Outcomes of simplified left atrial appendage occlusion using the WATCHMAN FLX device: the ROSE-FLX study.Europace : European pacing, arrhythmias, and cardiac electrophysiology : journal of the working groups on cardiac pacing, arrhythmias, and cardiac cellular electrophysiology of the European Society of Cardiology · 2026
    Article
  3. Review
  4. CT Imaging for Valvular Interventions.Structural heart : the journal of the Heart Team · 2025
    Review
  5. Review
  6. Article
  7. MRI-based training model for left atrial appendage closure.International journal of computer assisted radiology and surgery · 2023
    Article
  8. Role of Multimodality Imaging in Transcatheter Structural Interventions.Methodist DeBakey cardiovascular journal · 2023
    Article
  9. Computed tomography measurement for left atrial appendage closure.Cardiovascular intervention and therapeutics · 2022
    Review
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Computed tomography-based selection of transseptal puncture site for percutaneous left atrial appendage closure.EuroIntervention : journal of EuroPCR in collaboration with the Working Group on Interventional Cardiology of the European Society of Cardiology · 2022
    Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. SCAI/HRS Expert Consensus Statement on Transcatheter Left Atrial Appendage Closure.Journal of the Society for Cardiovascular Angiography & Interventions
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

12 authors.

Mirna KaafaraniCenter for Structural Heart Disease, Division of Cardiology, Henry Ford Health System, Detroit, Michigan, USA.
Jacqueline SawDivision of Cardiology, Vancouver General Hospital, British Columbia, Canada.
Matthew DanielsInstitute of Cardiovascular Sciences, University of Manchester, Manchester, UK.
Thomas SongDepartment of Cardiothoracic Radiology, Henry Ford Health System, Detroit, Michigan.
Marianne RolletCenter for Structural Heart Disease, Division of Cardiology, Henry Ford Health System, Detroit, Michigan, USA.
Sanel KesinovicWatchman, Interventional Cardiology Group, Boston Scientific, Marlborough, MA, USA.
Tony LamorgeseWatchman, Interventional Cardiology Group, Boston Scientific, Marlborough, MA, USA.
Kati KubiakCenter for Structural Heart Disease, Division of Cardiology, Henry Ford Health System, Detroit, Michigan, USA.
Zhihua QiDepartment of Cardiothoracic Radiology, Henry Ford Health System, Detroit, Michigan.
Milan PantelicDepartment of Cardiothoracic Radiology, Henry Ford Health System, Detroit, Michigan.
William O'NeillCenter for Structural Heart Disease, Division of Cardiology, Henry Ford Health System, Detroit, Michigan, USA.
Dee Dee WangCenter for Structural Heart Disease, Division of Cardiology, Henry Ford Health System, Detroit, Michigan, USA.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Computed tomography (CT) plays a key role in the peri-procedural planning of left atrial appendage occlusion (LAAO) device placement and post-procedural evaluation. The geometric variability of the interatrial septum, left atrium, and the left atrial appendage morphology can be fully visualized and intuitively appreciated through CT-derived, patient-specific 3D model unique to each individual's anatomy. This review further defines the strengths and limitations of CT peri-procedural imaging in the planning of LAAO.

Indexed as

3D modeling3D transesophageal echocardiogramartifactcomputerized tomographyLeft atrial appendage occlusionWATCHMAN™ device

Identifiers

PMID32175227
PMCPMC7044092

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.