ArticleTurk gogus kalp damar cerrahisi dergisi2020
Ultrasonographic postoperative evaluation of diaphragm function of patients with congenital heart defects.
Article in Turk gogus kalp damar cerrahisi dergisi, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed.
- Outcome and Clinical Characteristics of Diaphragm Dysfunction After Pediatric Cardiac Surgery: From Detection to Plication.Journal of the Saudi Heart Association · 2026Article
- Ultrasound assessment of diaphragmatic dysfunction in non-critically ill patients: relevant indicators and update.Frontiers in medicine · 2024Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundThis study aims to investigate the role of ultrasonography in the postoperative evaluation of diaphragm function in patients with congenital heart defect.
methodsThis prospective study included a total of 360 patients (176 males, 184 females; mean age 2 years; range, 1 month to 8 years) who underwent congenital heart surgery and 44 patients (22 males, 22 females; mean age 1 years; range, 1 month to 4 years) who underwent diaphragm ultrasonography between September 2018 and March 2019. Ultrasonography was performed for the patients who had difficulty in weaning from mechanical ventilation or who were thought to have diaphragm dysfunction due to pathological findings on postoperative chest X-rays. The findings were interpreted as normal, paresis, or paralysis.
resultsDiaphragm dysfunction was demonstrated in 23 patients (6.3%), paralysis in 11 patients (3%), and paresis in 12 patients (3.3%). A median sternotomy was performed in 21 patients (91%), and seven of them (30%) were redo cases. Five patients (21%) had single ventricle physiology. Six patients (1.6%) needed an intervention due to diaphragm dysfunction. The interventional procedures were diaphragm plication in three patients (0.8%) and tracheotomy in three patients (0.8%). Three of these patients had a single ventricle and three had biventricular physiology. The median time after surgery for these procedures was 36 days. One patient (0.2%) died in the intensive care unit. The mean length of stay in the intensive care unit and hospital was 36±12 and 48±21 days, respectively.
conclusionDiaphragm dysfunction should be kept in mind in patients undergoing congenital heart surgery and in those who need prolonged intubation during the postoperative period. Ultrasonography is a non-invasive diagnostic tool which can be used to identify diaphragm dysfunction and the best course of management of this clinical condition.
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.