ArticleBiomedical engineering letters2020
Quantitative assessment of compress-type osseointegrated prosthetic implants in human bone using electromechanical impedance spectroscopic methods.
Article in Biomedical engineering letters, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
3 citing papers in PubMed, 7 citations in OpenAlex.
- Electrical stimulation to promote osseointegration of bone anchoring implants: a topical review.Journal of neuroengineering and rehabilitation · 2022Review
- Optimal Position of Attachment for Removable Thermoplastic Aligner on the Lower Canine Using Finite Element Analysis.Materials (Basel, Switzerland) · 2020Article
- Special issue of biomedical engineering letters on advances in intelligent prostheses.Biomedical engineering letters · 2020Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Osseointegrated (OI) prostheses are a promising alternative to traditional socket prostheses. They can enhance the quality of life of amputees by avoiding fit and comfort issues commonly associated with sockets. The main structural element of the OI prosthesis is a biocompatible metallic implant that is surgically implanted into the bone of the residual limb. The implant is designed to provide a conducive surface for the host bone to osseointegrate with. The osseointegration process of the implant is difficult to clinically evaluate, leading to conservative postoperative rehabilitation approaches. Elastic stress waves generated in an OI prosthesis have been previously proposed to interrogate the implant-bone interface for quantitative assessment of the osseointegration process. This paper provides a detailed overview of the various elastic stress wave methods previously explored for in situ characterization of OI implants. Specifically, the paper explores the use of electromechanical impedance spectroscopy (EIS) to assess the OI process in compress-type OI prostheses. The EIS approach measures the electrical impedance spectrum of lead zirconate titanate elements bonded to the free end of the implant. The research utilizes both numerical simulation and experimental verification to establish that the electromechanical impedance spectrum is sensitive (between 400 and 460 kHz) to both the degree and location of osseointegration. A baseline-free OI index is proposed to quantify the degree of osseointegration at the implant-bone interface and to assess the stability of the OI implant for clinical decision making.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.