ArticleJournal of gastrointestinal oncology2020
Limited bias effect of intratumoral heterogeneity on genetic profiling of hepatocellular carcinoma.
Article in Journal of gastrointestinal oncology, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
3 citing papers in PubMed.
- Molecular profiling of circulating tumor cells guides effective EGFR inhibitor treatment in advanced hepatocellular carcinoma: a case report.Frontiers in oncology · 2025Article
- Review
- Update on Hepatocellular Carcinoma: a Brief Review from Pathologist Standpoint.Journal of gastrointestinal cancer · 2020Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
9 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Utilization of next-generation sequencing (NGS) to identify potential therapeutic targets and then prescribe matched agents provides new hope for patients with advanced cancer, such as hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC). However, intratumoral heterogeneity (ITH) challenges precise genomic profiling and may lead to target treatment failure. This study aims to evaluate whether and to what extent would genetic profiling be biased by ITH in HCC. We datamined publications focusing on the ITH of HCC and extracted the sequencing and clinicopathological information to make data reanalysis. Potential therapeutic targets and driver genes in HCC were specially pooled as reference to analyze the bias effect of ITH on genetic profiling. Five studies which analyzed ITH using NGS of multi-site samples were enrolled, with a total of 207 tumor samples from 36 HCC patients. The ITH ranged from 5.21% to 88.27% and no correlations between ITH extent and sample numbers, sequencing depth, or clinicopathological parameters were observed. In total, 72 therapeutic and 15 candidate driver genes were pooled as reference. Totally, 38.8% HCCs were found to be drugable in single-site sample, of which only 19.4% might be biased by ITH. Of the driver genes, 86% could be detected in single-site sample. HCC is a highly heterogeneous disease. While ITH indeed hinders comprehensive and precise HCC genome profiling, it has limited influences on identification of actionable and driver mutations. Single-site sampling/biopsy assayed with targeted deep sequencing might be efficient in the clinical management of HCC.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.