Evidence map›Paper›PMID 32175097›Full record

ReviewEFORT open reviews2020

Extended trochanteric osteotomy: improving the access and reducing the risk in revision THA.

Konrad Sebastian Wronka, Michell Gerard-Wilson, Elizabeth Peel, Ola Rolfson, Peter Herman Johan Cnudde

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in EFORT open reviews, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 17 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
17citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

17 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Extended trochanteric osteotomy is a safe procedure in two-stage hip revision: a systematic review of the literature.European journal of orthopaedic surgery & traumatology : orthopedie traumatologie · 2023
    Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Review
  8. Review
  9. Article
  10. Review
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. The Mechanism of Metallosis After Total Hip Arthroplasty.Regenerative engineering and translational medicine · 2021
    Article
  15. Article
  16. Review
  17. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Konrad Sebastian WronkaDepartment Of Orthopaedics, Prince Philip Hospital, Hywel Dda University Healthboard, Llanelli, UK.
Michell Gerard-WilsonDepartment Of Orthopaedics, Prince Philip Hospital, Hywel Dda University Healthboard, Llanelli, UK.
Elizabeth PeelDepartment Of Orthopaedics, Prince Philip Hospital, Hywel Dda University Healthboard, Llanelli, UK.
Ola RolfsonDepartment Of Orthopaedics, Institute of Clinical Sciences, Sahlgrenska Academy, Gothenburg, Sweden.
Peter Herman Johan CnuddeDepartment Of Orthopaedics, Prince Philip Hospital, Hywel Dda University Healthboard, Llanelli, UK.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

This review article presents a comprehensive literature review regarding extended trochanteric osteotomy (ETO).The history, rationale, biomechanical considerations as well as indications are discussed.The outcomes and complications as reported in the literature are presented, discussed and compared with our own practice.Based on the available evidence, we present our preferred technique for performing ETO, its fixation, as well as post-operative rehabilitation.The ETO aids implant removal and enhanced access. Reported union rate of ETO is high. The complications related to ETO are much less frequent than in cases when accidental intra-operative femoral fracture occurred that required fixation.Based on the literature and our own experience we recommend ETO as a useful adjunct in the arsenal of the revision hip specialist. Cite this article:

Indexed as

ETOextended trochanteric osteotomyrevision hip arthroplastyrevision hip replacementunion rate of ETO

Identifiers

PMID32175097
PMCPMC7047899

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.