Evidence map›Paper›PMID 32174918›Full record

ReviewFrontiers in immunology2020

Immunogenicity of TNF-Inhibitors.

Sadaf Atiqi, Femke Hooijberg, Floris C Loeff, Theo Rispens, Gerrit J Wolbink

Open access · goldAbstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Frontiers in immunology, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 96 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
96citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
11.1field-weighted citation impact, top 1% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

96 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 167 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Trial
  3. Trial
  4. Trial
  5. Trial
  6. Trial
  7. Trial
  8. Trial
  9. Trial
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Review
  14. Review
  15. Review
  16. FromFrontiers in immunology · 2026
    Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Review
  20. Article

36 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Sadaf AtiqiAmsterdam Rheumatology and Immunology Center, Department of Rheumatology, Reade, Amsterdam, Netherlands.
Femke HooijbergAmsterdam Rheumatology and Immunology Center, Department of Rheumatology, Reade, Amsterdam, Netherlands.
Floris C LoeffDepartment of Immunopathology, Sanquin Research and Landsteiner Laboratory Academic Medical Centre, Amsterdam, Netherlands.
Theo RispensDepartment of Immunopathology, Sanquin Research and Landsteiner Laboratory Academic Medical Centre, Amsterdam, Netherlands.
Gerrit J WolbinkAmsterdam Rheumatology and Immunology Center, Department of Rheumatology, Reade, Amsterdam, Netherlands.
Reade · NLSanquin · NL

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Tumor necrosis factor inhibitors (TNFi) have significantly improved treatment outcome of rheumatic diseases since their incorporation into treatment protocols two decades ago. Nevertheless, a substantial fraction of patients experiences either primary or secondary failure to TNFi due to ineffectiveness of the drug or adverse reactions. Secondary failure and adverse events can be related to the development of anti-drug antibodies (ADA). The earliest studies that reported ADA toward TNFi mainly used drug-sensitive assays. Retrospectively, we recognize this has led to an underestimation of the amount of ADA produced due to drug interference. Drug-tolerant ADA assays also detect ADA in the presence of drug, which has contributed to the currently reported higher incidence of ADA development. Comprehension and awareness of the assay format used for ADA detection is thus essential to interpret ADA measurements correctly. In addition, a concurrent drug level measurement is informative as it may provide insight in the extent of underestimation of ADA levels and improves understanding the clinical consequences of ADA formation. The clinical effects are dependent on the ratio between the amount of drug that is neutralized by ADA and the amount of unbound drug. Pharmacokinetic modeling might be useful in this context. The ADA response generally gives rise to high affinity IgG antibodies, but this response will differ between patients. Some patients will not reach the phase of affinity maturation while others generate an enduring high titer high affinity IgG response. This response can be transient in some patients, indicating a mechanism of tolerance induction or B-cell anergy. In this review several different aspects of the ADA response toward TNFi will be discussed. It will highlight the ADA assays, characteristics and regulation of the ADA response, impact of immunogenicity on the pharmacokinetics of TNFi, clinical implications of ADA formation, and possible mitigation strategies.

Indexed as

Antibodies, MonoclonalAntibodies, NeutralizingAntibody FormationAntigen-Antibody ComplexDrug InteractionsDrug MonitoringEpitopesHLA AntigensHumansImmune ToleranceImmunoassayImmunoglobulin IsotypesImmunosuppressive AgentsInfliximabInterleukin-10Risk FactorsAntibodies, MonoclonalAntibodies, NeutralizingAntigen-Antibody ComplexEpitopesHLA AntigensIL10 protein, humanImmunoglobulin IsotypesImmunosuppressive AgentsInfliximabInterleukin-10Tumor Necrosis Factor-alphaTumor Necrosis Factor Inhibitorsantidrug antibodiesassaydrug levelsimmunogenicitytumor necrosis factor inhibitors

Identifiers

PMID32174918
PMCPMC7055461
OpenAlexW3008855491

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.