Evidence map›Paper›PMID 32174803›Full record

ReviewFrontiers in neuroscience2020

NBOMes-Highly Potent and Toxic Alternatives of LSD.

Jolanta B Zawilska, Monika Kacela, Piotr Adamowicz

Open access · goldAbstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Frontiers in neuroscience, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 29 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
29citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
4.6field-weighted citation impact, top 4% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

29 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 75 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Classifying Psychedelic-Related Complications.Current topics in behavioral neurosciences · 2026
    Review
  4. Article
  5. Review
  6. Review
  7. Review
  8. Article
  9. Review
  10. Perioperative considerations for patients exposed to hallucinogens.Regional anesthesia and pain medicine · 2024
    Review
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Molecular and Medical Aspects of Psychedelics.International journal of molecular sciences · 2023
    Review
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Review
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Jolanta B ZawilskaDepartment of Pharmacodynamics, Medical University of Łódź, Łódź, Poland.
Monika KacelaDepartment of Pharmacodynamics, Medical University of Łódź, Łódź, Poland.
Piotr AdamowiczDepartment of Forensic Toxicology, Institute of Forensic Research, Kraków, Poland.
Medical University of Lodz · PLCentralne Laboratorium Kryminalistyczne Policji · PL

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Recently, a new class of psychedelic compounds named NBOMe (or 25X-NBOMe) has appeared on the illegal drug market. NBOMes are analogs of the 2C family of phenethylamine drugs, originally synthesized by Alexander Shulgin, that contain a

Indexed as

analytical methodsmetabolismNBOMenew psychoactive substancesphenethylaminespsychedelicstoxicity

Identifiers

PMID32174803
PMCPMC7054380
OpenAlexW3007555931

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.