Evidence map›Paper›PMID 32174767›Full record

ArticleThe journal of poultry science2020

Effects of Oral Administration of

Takahiro Nii, Jirapat Jirapat, Naoki Isobe, Yukinori Yoshimura

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in The journal of poultry science, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 19 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
19citing papers in PubMed
1.5field-weighted citation impact, top 17% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

19 citing papers in PubMed, 29 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Review
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Review
  14. Article
  15. Overview of the Importance of Biotics in Gut Barrier Integrity.International journal of molecular sciences · 2022
    Review
  16. Frontiers in immunology · 2022
    Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Effects of ProbioticsThe journal of poultry science · 2020
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors at 2 institutions in 2 countries.

Takahiro NiiGraduate School of Biosphere Science, Hiroshima University, Higashi-Hiroshima, Japan.
Jirapat JirapatFaculty of Veterinary Technology, Kasetsart University, Bangkok, Thailand.
Naoki IsobeGraduate School of Biosphere Science, Hiroshima University, Higashi-Hiroshima, Japan.
Yukinori YoshimuraGraduate School of Biosphere Science, Hiroshima University, Higashi-Hiroshima, Japan.
Hiroshima University · JPKasetsart University · TH

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Probiotic bacteria are known for their beneficial effects on the intestinal immune function of the host animal. However, their effects on mucosal barrier function in chicks are not completely understood. The aim of this study was to determine the effects of the probiotic bacterium,

Indexed as

AvBDbroiler chickcytokinedigestive tractprobioticstight junction

Identifiers

PMID32174767
PMCPMC7063073
OpenAlexW2945618721

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-SA
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.