ReviewDementia and neurocognitive disorders2020
Alzheimer's Disease Diagnosis Using Misfolding Proteins in Blood.
Review in Dementia and neurocognitive disorders, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 8 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
8 citing papers in PubMed, 14 citations in OpenAlex.
- Association of qEEG TAR and TBR During Eyes-Open and Eyes-Closed with Plasma Oligomeric Amyloid-β Levels in an Aging Population.Journal of clinical medicine · 2025Article
- Multimer Detection System: A Universal Assay System for Differentiating Protein Oligomers from Monomers.International journal of molecular sciences · 2025Review
- Demystifying the Role of Neuroinflammatory Mediators as Biomarkers for Diagnosis, Prognosis, and Treatment of Alzheimer's Disease: A Review.ACS pharmacology & translational science · 2024Review
- The nasal lymphatic route of CSF outflow: implications for neurodegenerative disease diagnosis and monitoring.Animal cells and systems · 2024Review
- Association of Hearing Loss With Anatomical and Functional Connectivity in Patients With Mild Cognitive Impairment.JAMA otolaryngology-- head & neck surgery · 2023Article
- Is liquid biopsy mature enough for the diagnosis of Alzheimer's disease?Frontiers in aging neuroscience · 2022Review
- Is Korea Prepared for an Alzheimer's Disease-Modifying Therapy? Assessing the Korean Healthcare System Infrastructure and the Effect of Blood-Based Biomarker Tests.Annals of geriatric medicine and research · 2021Article
- Study on the Influence of mRNA, the Genetic Language, on Protein Folding Rates.Frontiers in genetics · 2021Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors at 1 institution in 2 countries.
Funding
Abstract
Alzheimer's disease (AD) is pathologically characterized by a long progressive phase of neuronal changes, including accumulation of extracellular amyloid-β (Aβ) and intracellular neurofibrillary tangles, before the onset of observable symptoms. Many efforts have been made to develop a blood-based diagnostic method for AD by incorporating Aβ and tau as plasma biomarkers. As blood tests have the advantages of being highly accessible and low cost, clinical implementation of AD blood tests would provide preventative screening to presymptomatic individuals, facilitating early identification of AD patients and, thus, treatment development in clinical research. However, the low concentration of AD biomarkers in the plasma has posed difficulties for accurate detection, hindering the development of a reliable blood test. In this review, we introduce three AD blood test technologies emerging in South Korea, which have distinctive methods of heightening detection sensitivity of specific plasma biomarkers. We discuss in detail the multimer detection system, the self-standard analysis of Aβ biomarkers quantified by interdigitated microelectrodes, and a biomarker ratio analysis comprising Aβ and tau.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.