Evidence map›Paper›PMID 32173782›Full record

ArticleOsteoporosis international : a journal established as result of cooperation between the European Foundation for Osteoporosis and the National Osteoporosis Foundation of the USA2020

Fracture risk following high-trauma versus low-trauma fracture: a registry-based cohort study.

W D Leslie, J T Schousboe, S N Morin, P Martineau, L M Lix, H Johansson, E V McCloskey, N C Harvey, J A Kanis

Open access · greenAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Osteoporosis international : a journal established as result of cooperation between the European Foundation for Osteoporosis and the National Osteoporosis Foundation of the USA, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 60 papers, 8 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
60citing papers in PubMed, 8 pooled it
9.3field-weighted citation impact, top 1% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

60 citing papers in PubMed, 8 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 86 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. A meta-analysis of smoking and fracture risk to update the FRAX® tool.Osteoporosis international : a journal established as result of cooperation between the European Foundation for Osteoporosis and the National Osteoporosis Foundation of the USA · 2026
    Pooled it
  2. Body mass index and subsequent fracture risk: a meta-analysis to update FRAX.Journal of bone and mineral research : the official journal of the American Society for Bone and Mineral Research · 2025
    Pooled it
  3. Guideline
  4. Family history of fracture and fracture risk: a meta-analysis to update the FRAX® risk assessment tool.Osteoporosis international : a journal established as result of cooperation between the European Foundation for Osteoporosis and the National Osteoporosis Foundation of the USA · 2025
    Pooled it
  5. Guideline
  6. Previous fracture and subsequent fracture risk: a meta-analysis to update FRAX.Osteoporosis international : a journal established as result of cooperation between the European Foundation for Osteoporosis and the National Osteoporosis Foundation of the USA · 2023
    Pooled it
  7. Guideline
  8. Systematic review of major osteoporotic fracture to hip fracture incidence rate ratios worldwide: implications for Fracture Risk Assessment Tool (FRAX)-derived estimates.Journal of bone and mineral research : the official journal of the American Society for Bone and Mineral Research · 2021
    Pooled it
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Increased fracture risk associated with iron-deficiency anemia: a population-based propensity score matched cohort study.Osteoporosis international : a journal established as result of cooperation between the European Foundation for Osteoporosis and the National Osteoporosis Foundation of the USA · 2026
    Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Review
  20. Osteoporosis in Men: an Overlooked Patient Population.Current osteoporosis reports · 2025
    Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors at 7 institutions in 4 countries.

W D LeslieDepartment of Medicine (C5121), University of Manitoba, 409 Tache Avenue, Winnipeg, Manitoba, R2H 2A6, Canada. bleslie@sbgh.mb.ca.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-1056-1691
J T SchousboePark Nicollet Clinic & HealthPartners Institute, Minneapolis, USA.
S N MorinMcGill University, Montreal, Canada.
P MartineauDepartment of Medicine (C5121), University of Manitoba, 409 Tache Avenue, Winnipeg, Manitoba, R2H 2A6, Canada.
L M LixDepartment of Medicine (C5121), University of Manitoba, 409 Tache Avenue, Winnipeg, Manitoba, R2H 2A6, Canada.
H JohanssonCentre for Metabolic Bone Diseases, University of Sheffield Medical School, Sheffield, UK.
E V McCloskeyCentre for Metabolic Bone Diseases, University of Sheffield Medical School, Sheffield, UK.
N C HarveyMRC Lifecourse Epidemiology Unit, University of Southampton, Southampton, UK.
J A KanisCentre for Metabolic Bone Diseases, University of Sheffield Medical School, Sheffield, UK.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-3129-4326
Australian Catholic University · AUUniversity of Manitoba · CAHarvard University · USMcGill University · CAUniversity Hospital Southampton NHS Foundation Trust · GBUniversity of Minnesota · USUniversity of Sheffield · GB

Funding

Medical Research Council MC_UU_12011/1Versus Arthritis 17702Versus Arthritis 21231
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Prior high-trauma fractures identified through health services data are associated with low bone mineral density (BMD) and future fracture risk to the same extent as fractures without high-trauma.

introductionSome have questioned the usefulness of distinguishing high-trauma fractures from low-trauma fractures. The aim of this study is to compare BMD measurements and risk of subsequent low-trauma fracture in patients with prior high- or low-trauma fractures.

methodsUsing a clinical BMD registry for the province of Manitoba, Canada, we identified women and men age 40 years or older with fracture records from linked population-based healthcare data. Age- and sex-adjusted BMD Z-scores and covariate-adjusted hazard ratios (HR) with 95% confidence intervals (CI) for incident fracture were studied in relation to prior fracture status, categorized as high-trauma if associated with external injury codes and low-trauma otherwise.

resultsThe study population consisted of 64,428 women and men with no prior fracture (mean age 63.7 years), 858 with prior high-trauma fractures (mean age 65.1 years), and 14,758 with prior low-trauma fractures (mean age 67.2 years). Mean Z-scores for those with any prior high-trauma fracture were significantly lower than in those without prior fracture (P < 0.001) and similar to those with prior low-trauma fracture. Median observation time for incident fractures was 8.8 years (total 729,069 person-years). Any prior high-trauma fracture was significantly associated with increased risk for incident major osteoporotic fracture (MOF) (adjusted HR 1.31, 95% CI 1.08-1.59) as was prior low-trauma fracture (adjusted HR 1.55, 95% CI 1.47-1.63), and there was no significant difference between the two groups (prior trauma versus low-trauma fracture P = 0.093). A similar pattern was seen when incident MOF was studied in relation to prior hip fracture or prior MOF, or when the outcome was incident hip fracture or any incident fracture.

conclusionsHigh-trauma and low-trauma fractures showed similar relationships with low BMD and future fracture risk. This supports the inclusion of high-trauma fractures in clinical assessment for underlying osteoporosis and in the evaluation for intervention to reduce future fracture risk.

Indexed as

Osteoporotic FracturesAbsorptiometry, PhotonAdultAgedBone DensityCohort StudiesFemaleFractures, BoneHumansMaleManitobaMiddle AgedRegistriesRisk AssessmentRisk FactorsDual-energy X-ray absorptiometryFracturesOsteoporosisTrauma

Identifiers

PMID32173782
PMCPMC7115893
OpenAlexW3011749932

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.