ArticleThe Journal of reproduction and development2020
Combined refinements to somatic cell nuclear transfer methods improve porcine embryo development.
Article in The Journal of reproduction and development, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed.
- - Invited Review - Reproductive technologies needed for the generation of precise gene-edited pigs in the pathways from laboratory to farm.Animal bioscience · 2023Article
- Crosstalk between Peroxisomal Activities and Nrf2 Signaling in Porcine Embryos.Antioxidants (Basel, Switzerland) · 2021Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
8 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
The discovery of how to utilize CRISPR (clustered, regularly interspaced, short, palindromic repeats)-Cas (CRISPR-associated) systems for genome modification has accelerated development of the field of genome editing, especially in large animals such as pigs. The low efficiency of somatic cell nuclear transfer (SCNT) is now becoming a major obstacle in the production of genome-edited animals via cell-mediated approaches and improving efficacy of this technique is crucial. In this study, we propose a few simple modifications to a zona-free SCNT protocol that are effective to produce numerous high-quality blastocysts. To refine the SCNT protocol we modified the following steps/factors: 1) culture medium for SCNT embryos, 2) chemical treatment to prevent precocious activation of the manipulated/reconstructed oocytes and 3) donor cell serum starvation treatment. Although changes in each of these steps only resulted in small improvements, the combination of all modifications altogether significantly enhanced developmental competence of SCNT embryos. Our modified method yielded approximately three times greater blastocyst formation rates. Moreover, resulting blastocysts had roughly twice as many cells as compared to blastocysts produced by the conventional SCNT method. With these significant in vitro improvements, our refined SCNT method is potentially suited for use in the production of genome edited pigs.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.