Evidence map›Paper›PMID 32173661›Full record

ArticleIndustrial health2020

Construct validity and test-retest reliability of the World Mental Health Japan version of the World Health Organization Health and Work Performance Questionnaire Short Version: a preliminary study.

Norito Kawakami, Akiomi Inoue, Masao Tsuchiya, Kazuhiro Watanabe, Kotaro Imamura, Mako Iida, Daisuke Nishi

Open access · diamondAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Industrial health, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 43 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
43citing papers in PubMed
7.8field-weighted citation impact, top 2% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

43 citing papers in PubMed, 57 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Trial
  2. Trial
  3. Trial
  4. Trial
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Review
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors at 3 institutions in 2 countries.

Norito KawakamiDepartment of Mental Health, Graduate School of Medicine, The University of Tokyo, Japan.
Akiomi InoueDepartment of Public Health, Kitasato University School of Medicine, Japan.
Masao TsuchiyaDepartment of Mental Health, Graduate School of Medicine, The University of Tokyo, Japan.
Kazuhiro WatanabeDepartment of Mental Health, Graduate School of Medicine, The University of Tokyo, Japan.
Kotaro ImamuraDepartment of Mental Health, Graduate School of Medicine, The University of Tokyo, Japan.
Mako IidaDepartment of Psychiatric Nursing, Graduate School of Medicine, The University of Tokyo, Japan.
Daisuke NishiDepartment of Mental Health, Graduate School of Medicine, The University of Tokyo, Japan.
The University of Tokyo · JPNational Institute of Mental Health · JPKitasato University · JP

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The aim of the study was to investigate test-retest reliability and construct validity of the World Mental Health Japan (WMHJ) version of World Health Organization Health and Performance Questionnaire (WHO-HPQ) short version according the COSMIN standard. We conducted two consecutive surveys of 102 full-time employees recruited through an Internet survey company in Japan, with a two-week interval in 2018. We calculated Pearson's correlation (r) of measures of the WHO-HPQ with other presenteeism scales (Stanford Presenteeism Scale, Work Functioning Impairment Scale, and perceived relative presenteeism), health and psychosocial job conditions. We tested the test-retest reliability (intraclass correlation, ICC) among those who reported no change of job performance during the follow-up. Among 92 (90%) respondents, the absolute presenteeism significantly correlated with WFun and perceived relative presenteeism (r=-0.341 and -0.343, respectively, p=0.001) and psychological distress (r=-0.247, p=0.018). The absolute/relative absenteeism did not significantly correlate with the other covariates. The test-retest reliability over a two-week period was high for the WHO-HPQ absolute presenteeism (ICC, 0.73), while those for absolute/relative absenteeism measures were moderate. The study found an adequate level of test-retest reliability, but limited support for the construct validity of the absolute presenteeism measure of the WMHJ version of the WHO-HPQ. Further research is needed to investigate the construct validity of the WHO-HPQ measures in a larger sample.

Indexed as

Reproducibility of ResultsWork PerformanceAbsenteeismAdultFemaleHumansJapanMaleMiddle AgedPresenteeismPsychological DistressSurveys and QuestionnairesAbsenteeismConsensus-based standards for the selection of Health Measurement Instruments (COSMIN)PresenteeismProductivityTest-retest reliability

Identifiers

PMID32173661
PMCPMC7417506
OpenAlexW3010894672

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.