Trial reportGastroenterology2020
Effects of Blended (Yellow) vs Forced Coagulation (Blue) Currents on Adverse Events, Complete Resection, or Polyp Recurrence After Polypectomy in a Large Randomized Trial.
Trial report in Gastroenterology, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT01936948 (Safety of Endoscopic Resection of Large Colorectal Polyps), which is not on this map. Cited by 18 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Safety of Endoscopic Resection of Large Colorectal Polyps: A Randomized Trial.
Who cites it
18 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 52 citations in OpenAlex.
- Quality indicators for colonoscopy.Gastrointestinal endoscopy · 2024Guideline
- Recurrence rates after endoscopic resection of large colorectal polyps: A systematic review and meta-analysis.World journal of gastroenterology · 2022Pooled it
- Trial
- Tranexamic Acid Versus Epinephrine as Submucosal Injectate During Endoscopic Mucosal Resection of Large Colorectal Lesions: A Randomized Controlled Trial.Journal of clinical medicine · 2026Article
- Of Endpoints and Equipoise: Reforming Clinical Trials in Colorectal Polyp Resection.Current gastroenterology reports · 2025Review
- Comparison of three electrosurgical modes for endoscopic mucosal resection of 10- to 20-mm colorectal polyps: Randomized controlled trial.Endoscopy international open · 2025Article
- Experience, Outcomes, and Insights on Endoscopic Colonic Polyp Excision: A Retrospective Cohort Study.Cureus · 2024Article
- Quality Indicators for Colonoscopy.The American journal of gastroenterology · 2024Article
- Dual Channel Endoscopic Mucosal Resection.Clinics in colon and rectal surgery · 2024Review
- Electrosurgery: heating, sparking and electrical arcs.Facts, views & vision in ObGyn · 2024Article
- The Recurrence Rate of Colorectal Polyps among Patients with Average Risk of Colorectal Cancer.Asian Pacific journal of cancer prevention : APJCP · 2024Article
- Cervical conization with endoCUT mode applying gastrointestinal endoscopic polypectomy technique.Obstetrics & gynecology science · 2023Article
- JAG consensus statements for training and certification in colonoscopy.Frontline gastroenterology · 2023Article
- JAG consensus statements for training and certification in flexible sigmoidoscopy.Frontline gastroenterology · 2023Article
- Endoscopic mucosal resection: tips and tricks for gastrointestinal trainees.Translational gastroenterology and hepatology · 2023Review
- Endoscopic Mucosal Resection: Best Practices for Gastrointestinal Endoscopists.Gastroenterology & hepatology · 2022Article
- Delayed Bleeding After Endoscopic Resection of Colorectal Polyps: Identifying High-Risk Patients.Clinical and experimental gastroenterology · 2021Review
- Triaging advanced GI endoscopy procedures during the COVID-19 pandemic: consensus recommendations using the Delphi method.Gastrointestinal endoscopy · 2020Article
Corrections and comments
- Commented on by
Authors and funding
23 authors at 17 institutions in 3 countries.
Funding
Abstract
BACKGROUND &
aimsThere is debate over the type of electrosurgical setting that should be used for polyp resection. Some endoscopists use a type of blended current (yellow), whereas others prefer coagulation (blue). We performed a single-blinded, randomized trial to determine whether type of electrosurgical setting affects risk of adverse events or recurrence.
methodsPatients undergoing endoscopic mucosal resection of nonpedunculated colorectal polyps 20 mm or larger (n = 928) were randomly assigned, in a 2 × 2 design, to groups that received clip closure or no clip closure of the resection defect (primary intervention) and then to either a blended current (Endocut Q) or coagulation current (forced coagulation) (Erbe Inc) (secondary intervention and focus of the study). The study was performed at multiple centers, from April 2013 through October 2017. Patients were evaluated 30 days after the procedure (n = 919), and 675 patients underwent a surveillance colonoscopy at a median of 6 months after the procedure. The primary outcome was any severe adverse event in a per patient analysis. Secondary outcomes were complete resection and recurrence at first surveillance colonoscopy in a per polyp analysis.
resultsSerious adverse events occurred in 7.2% of patients in the Endocut group and 7.9% of patients in the forced coagulation group, with no significant differences in the occurrence of types of events. There were no significant differences between groups in proportions of polyps that were completely removed (96% in the Endocut group vs 95% in the forced coagulation group) or the proportion of polyps found to have recurred at surveillance colonoscopy (17% and 17%, respectively). Procedural characteristics were comparable, except that 17% of patients in the Endocut group had immediate bleeding that required an intervention, compared with 11% in the forced coagulation group (P = .006).
conclusionsIn a randomized trial to compare 2 commonly used electrosurgical settings for the resection of large colorectal polyps (Endocut vs forced coagulation), we found no difference in risk of serious adverse events, complete resection rate, or polyp recurrence. Electrosurgical settings can therefore be selected based on endoscopist expertise and preference. Clinicaltrials.gov ID NCT01936948.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.