ArticleNeuroImage2020
Does higher sampling rate (multiband + SENSE) improve group statistics - An example from social neuroscience block design at 3T.
Article in NeuroImage, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 14 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
14 citing papers in PubMed, 32 citations in OpenAlex.
- An Examination of Task-Evoked fMRI Data Processing in Functional Connectivity.Journal of neuroscience research · 2026Article
- An evaluation of the efficacy of single-echo and multi-echo fMRI denoising strategies.Network neuroscience (Cambridge, Mass.) · 2026Article
- The Impact of Multiband and In-Plane Acceleration on White Matter Microstructure Analysis.Human brain mapping · 2025Article
- Resting-state amygdala subregion and precuneus connectivity provide evidence for a dimensional approach to studying social anxiety disorder.Translational psychiatry · 2024Article
- Article
- Aging-related changes in reward-based decision-making depend on punishment frequency: An fMRI study.Frontiers in aging neuroscience · 2023Article
- Distinct Neural Profiles of Frontoparietal Networks in Boys with ADHD and Boys with Persistent Depressive Disorder.Cognitive, affective & behavioral neuroscience · 2022Article
- Altered brain functional network dynamics in classic trigeminal neuralgia: a resting-state functional magnetic resonance imaging study.The journal of headache and pain · 2021Article
- Evaluation of single bolus, dual-echo dynamic susceptibility contrast MRI protocols in brain tumor patients.Journal of cerebral blood flow and metabolism : official journal of the International Society of Cerebral Blood Flow and Metabolism · 2021Article
- Looking Back at the Next 40 Years of ASD Neuroscience Research.Journal of autism and developmental disorders · 2021Review
- Statistical power or more precise insights into neuro-temporal dynamics? Assessing the benefits of rapid temporal sampling in fMRI.Progress in neurobiology · 2021Review
- An empirical investigation of the benefit of increasing the temporal resolution of task-evoked fMRI data with multi-band imaging.Magma (New York, N.Y.) · 2021Article
- Imaging the temporal dynamics of brain states with highly sampled fMRI.Current opinion in behavioral sciences · 2021Article
- Brain network mechanisms of visual shape completion.NeuroImage · 2021Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
8 authors at 3 institutions in 2 countries.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Multiband (MB) or Simultaneous multi-slice (SMS) acquisition schemes allow the acquisition of MRI signals from more than one spatial coordinate at a time. Commercial availability has brought this technique within the reach of many neuroscientists and psychologists. Most early evaluation of the performance of MB acquisition employed resting state fMRI or the most basic tasks. In this study, we tested whether the advantages of using MB acquisition schemes generalize to group analyses using a cognitive task more representative of typical cognitive neuroscience applications. Twenty-three subjects were scanned on a Philips 3 T scanner using five sequences, up to eight-fold acceleration with MB-factors 1 to 4, SENSE factors up to 2 and corresponding TRs of 2.45s down to 0.63s, while they viewed (i) movie blocks showing complex actions with hand object interactions and (ii) control movie blocks without hand object interaction. Data were processed using a widely used analysis pipeline implemented in SPM12 including the unified segmentation and canonical HRF modelling. Using random effects group-level, voxel-wise analysis we found that all sequences were able to detect the basic action observation network known to be recruited by our task. The highest t-values were found for sequences with MB4 acceleration. For the MB1 sequence, a 50% bigger voxel volume was needed to reach comparable t-statistics. The group-level t-values for resting state networks (RSNs) were also highest for MB4 sequences. Here the MB1 sequence with larger voxel size did not perform comparable to the MB4 sequence. Altogether, we can thus recommend the use of MB4 (and SENSE 1.5 or 2) on a Philips scanner when aiming to perform group-level analyses using cognitive block design fMRI tasks and voxel sizes in the range of cortical thickness (e.g. 2.7 mm isotropic). While results will not be dramatically changed by the use of multiband, our results suggest that MB will bring a moderate but significant benefit.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.