Evidence map›Paper›PMID 32172536›Full record

ArticleInternational journal of methods in psychiatric research2020

Measurement equivalence of the Kessler 6 Psychological Distress Scale for Chinese and Korean immigrants: Comparison between younger and older adults.

En-Jung Shon

Open access · goldAbstract readComparative Study
In one paragraph

Article in International journal of methods in psychiatric research, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 7 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
7citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
1.1field-weighted citation impact, top 20% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

7 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 12 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Modelling triadic relationships in families of children with intellectual disability.Journal of applied research in intellectual disabilities : JARID · 2022
    Article
  7. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

1 author at 1 institution in 1 country.

En-Jung ShonDepartment of Family Science and Social Work, College of Education, Health and Society, Miami University in Ohio, Oxford, Ohio, USA.ORCID 0000-0001-7018-9724
Miami University · US

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

objectivesThe Kessler 6 (K6) Psychological Distress Scale is a well-known instrument to screen for psychological distress of general populations. It is critical to perform the equivalence test of the K6 for Asian immigrant subgroups.

methodsThe 2012 California Health Interview Survey data were used (N = 1,210; Chinese = 640, Koreans = 570). Among 1,210, 734 were younger (18-64 years) and 476 were older (65+) adults. It was examined whether parameters in the measurement model is equivalent across the two groups, using multiple-group analysis. The equivalence tests for Chinese and Koreans were separately performed based on different age groups (younger [18-64] vs. older [65+]).

resultsThe younger group had good model fit (X

conclusionsClinicians/researchers should be aware of the potential risk for misclassification when they screen psychological distress of Chinese or Korean older immigrants. Professionals should pay attention to cross-cultural comparability when interpreting results from the K6.

Indexed as

AgingAsianAdolescentAdultAgedAge FactorsAnxietyChinaCulturally Competent CareDepressionHumansMiddle AgedPsychiatric Status Rating ScalesPsychological DistressRepublic of KoreaStress, PsychologicalAsian immigrant subgroupsK6measurement equivalencepsychological distressyounger and older Asian immigrants

Identifiers

PMID32172536
PMCPMC7301282
OpenAlexW3011755729

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.