Evidence map›Paper›PMID 32172492›Full record

ArticleJournal of cancer education : the official journal of the American Association for Cancer Education2021

Development and Validation of the Oral Health-Related Self-Efficacy Scale for Cancer Patients.

Yuhei Matsuda, Masaaki Karino, Takahiro Kanno

Abstract read
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of cancer education : the official journal of the American Association for Cancer Education, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
4citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

4 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Review
  3. Article
  4. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Yuhei MatsudaDepartment of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery, Shimane University Faculty of Medicine, Shimane, Japan. yuhei@med.shimane-u.ac.jp.ORCID 0000-0001-8922-3582
Masaaki KarinoDepartment of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery, Shimane University Faculty of Medicine, Shimane, Japan.
Takahiro KannoDepartment of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery, Shimane University Faculty of Medicine, Shimane, Japan.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

This study aimed to validate the Oral Health-related Self-Efficacy Scale for Patients with Cancer (OSEC), comprised of 17 questions (five factors). To this end, a sample of 203 cancer patients was recruited (August 2018-April 2019) followed by a random subsampling for test-retest reliability. Concurrent validity was tested by correlating scores with the Self-efficacy Scale for Advanced Cancer (SEAC), discriminant validity was tested by comparing high OSEC to low OSEC groups, and predictive validity was tested using a plaque control record. Five OSEC factors had Cronbach's alpha coefficients ranging from 0.75 to 0.88. The intraclass correlation coefficient of the total score was 0.92 upon test-retest reliability. The factor-level scores significantly related to all the SEAC factor-level scores. The differences between the high OSEC and low OSEC groups were statistically significant in the total score and on all factor-level scores (p < 0.01). The plaque control record of the high OSEC group was significantly lower than that of the low OSEC group (p < 0.01). In conclusion, the OSEC can be used for understanding cancer patients' motives for oral care behaviors and applied to program planning to increase self-efficacy and health behaviors.

Indexed as

NeoplasmsOral HealthHumansPsychometricsReproducibility of ResultsSelf EfficacySurveys and QuestionnairesCancer patientsOral healthScale reliabilityScale validitySelf-efficacy

Identifiers

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.