Evidence map›Paper›PMID 32172457›Full record

ArticleCellular and molecular neurobiology2020

Growth-Promoting Treatment Screening for Corticospinal Neurons in Mouse and Man.

Nicholas Hanuscheck, Andrea Schnatz, Carine Thalman, Steffen Lerch, Yvonne Gärtner, Micaela Domingues, Lynn Bitar, Robert Nitsch, Frauke Zipp, Christina F Vogelaar

Open access · hybridAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Cellular and molecular neurobiology, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
3citing papers in PubMed
0.3field-weighted citation impact, top 50% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

3 citing papers in PubMed, 6 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

10 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Nicholas HanuscheckDepartment of Neurology, Focus Program Translational Neuroscience (FTN) and Immunotherapy (FZI), Rhine Main Neuroscience Network (rmn2), University Medical Center of the Johannes Gutenberg University Mainz, 55131, Mainz, Germany.
Andrea SchnatzInstitute for Developmental Biology and Neurobiology, Molecular Cell Biology, Johannes Gutenberg University Mainz, 55099, Mainz, Germany.
Carine ThalmanDepartment of Neurology, Focus Program Translational Neuroscience (FTN) and Immunotherapy (FZI), Rhine Main Neuroscience Network (rmn2), University Medical Center of the Johannes Gutenberg University Mainz, 55131, Mainz, Germany.
Steffen LerchDepartment of Neurology, Focus Program Translational Neuroscience (FTN) and Immunotherapy (FZI), Rhine Main Neuroscience Network (rmn2), University Medical Center of the Johannes Gutenberg University Mainz, 55131, Mainz, Germany.
Yvonne GärtnerDepartment of Neurology, Focus Program Translational Neuroscience (FTN) and Immunotherapy (FZI), Rhine Main Neuroscience Network (rmn2), University Medical Center of the Johannes Gutenberg University Mainz, 55131, Mainz, Germany.
Micaela DominguesDepartment of Neurology, Focus Program Translational Neuroscience (FTN) and Immunotherapy (FZI), Rhine Main Neuroscience Network (rmn2), University Medical Center of the Johannes Gutenberg University Mainz, 55131, Mainz, Germany.
Lynn BitarDepartment of Neurology, Focus Program Translational Neuroscience (FTN) and Immunotherapy (FZI), Rhine Main Neuroscience Network (rmn2), University Medical Center of the Johannes Gutenberg University Mainz, 55131, Mainz, Germany.
Robert NitschUniversity Medical Center, Institute for Translational Neuroscience, Westfälische Wilhelms-University Münster, Albert-Schweitzer-Campus, 48149, Münster, Germany.
Frauke ZippDepartment of Neurology, Focus Program Translational Neuroscience (FTN) and Immunotherapy (FZI), Rhine Main Neuroscience Network (rmn2), University Medical Center of the Johannes Gutenberg University Mainz, 55131, Mainz, Germany.
Christina F VogelaarDepartment of Neurology, Focus Program Translational Neuroscience (FTN) and Immunotherapy (FZI), Rhine Main Neuroscience Network (rmn2), University Medical Center of the Johannes Gutenberg University Mainz, 55131, Mainz, Germany. tineke.vogelaar@unimedizin-mainz.de.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-9683-7336
Johannes Gutenberg University Mainz · DE

Funding

Deutsche Forschungsgemeinschaft CRC1080Deutsche Forschungsgemeinschaft CRC-TR-128Gemeinnützige Hertie-Stiftung P1180009Progressive MS alliance PA-1604-08492
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Neurons of the central nervous system (CNS) that project long axons into the spinal cord have a poor axon regenerative capacity compared to neurons of the peripheral nervous system. The corticospinal tract (CST) is particularly notorious for its poor regeneration. Because of this, traumatic spinal cord injury (SCI) is a devastating condition that remains as yet uncured. Based on our recent observations that direct neuronal interleukin-4 (IL-4) signaling leads to repair of axonal swellings and beneficial effects in neuroinflammation, we hypothesized that IL-4 acts directly on the CST. Here, we developed a tissue culture model for CST regeneration and found that IL-4 promoted new growth cone formation after axon transection. Most importantly, IL-4 directly increased the regenerative capacity of both murine and human CST axons, which corroborates its regenerative effects in CNS damage. Overall, these findings serve as proof-of-concept that our CST regeneration model is suitable for fast screening of new treatments for SCI.

Indexed as

AnimalsAxonsHumansMice, Inbred C57BLNerve RegenerationNeuronsPTEN PhosphohydrolasePyramidal TractsRecovery of FunctionSpinal Cord InjuriesPTEN PhosphohydrolaseCorticospinal tractGrowth-promoting treatmentInterleukin-4RegenerationSpinal cord injury

Identifiers

PMID32172457
PMCPMC7497511
OpenAlexW3011964819

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.