ReviewCurrent osteoporosis reports2020
Pharmacologic Treatments to Preserve Bone and Muscle Mass in Osteosarcopenia.
Review in Current osteoporosis reports, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
5 citing papers in PubMed, 5 citations in OpenAlex.
- The Rising Burden of Osteosarcopenia in Older Adults: A Narrative Review of Pathophysiology, Diagnostic Challenges, and Therapeutic Perspectives.Health science reports · 2026Article
- Musculoskeletal Issues in Pediatric Burn Patients.Seminars in plastic surgery · 2024Review
- Research advances in crosstalk between muscle and bone in osteosarcopenia (Review).Experimental and therapeutic medicine · 2023Review
- Is sarcopenia associated with osteoporosis? A cross-sectional study of 262 women with hip fracture.European journal of physical and rehabilitation medicine · 2022Article
- Osteosarcopenia: A Narrative Review on Clinical Studies.International journal of molecular sciences · 2022Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
1 author at 1 institution in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
purpose of reviewWe aim to recast the diagnosis of osteosarcopenia in light of its pathophysiology rather than of the age at which it is diagnosed. We will consider why we think the diagnosis of osteosarcopenia is missed in those who are not elderly and why pharmacologic treatment based on pathophysiology rather than age may provide a more comprehensive treatment for patients with the condition. RECENT
findingsWe will present recent findings on the pathogenesis of osteosarcopenia from two distinct groups of patients which will highlight why pathophysiology is of paramount importance in designing treatment. We will show that in patients with cancer and burns, muscle catabolic factors are released from bone on resorption, exert a paracrine effect on muscle to cause catabolism, and can be prevented with the use of anti-resorptive drugs. New uses for anti-resorptives may result from these findings.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.