Evidence map›Paper›PMID 32172433›Full record

GuidelineFamilial cancer2020

Collaborative Group of the Americas on Inherited Gastrointestinal Cancer Position statement on multigene panel testing for patients with colorectal cancer and/or polyposis.

Brandie Heald, Heather Hampel, James Church, Beth Dudley, Michael J Hall, Maureen E Mork, Aparajita Singh, Elena Stoffel, Jessica Stoll, Y Nancy You and 3 more

Abstract readPractice GuidelineReview
In one paragraph

Guideline in Familial cancer, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 34 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
34citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

34 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Review
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Review
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Colorectal cancer genetic referral: Are we doing enough?Proceedings (Baylor University. Medical Center) · 2024
    Article
  12. Review
  13. Article
  14. Review
  15. Article
  16. Comprehensive Analysis of Early-onset Colorectal Cancer: A Review.Journal of the anus, rectum and colon · 2023
    Review
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

13 authors.

Brandie HealdSanford R Weiss, MD, Center for Hereditary Colorectal Neoplasia, Cleveland Clinic, Cleveland, OH, USA. leachb@ccf.org.
Heather HampelDivision of Human Genetics, Department of Internal Medicine and the Comprehensive Cancer Center, The Ohio State University, Columbus, OH, USA.
James ChurchSanford R Weiss, MD, Center for Hereditary Colorectal Neoplasia, Cleveland Clinic, Cleveland, OH, USA.
Beth DudleyDepartment of Medicine, University of Pittsburgh, Pittsburgh, PA, USA.
Michael J HallDepartment of Clinical Genetics, Fox Chase Cancer Center, Philadelphia, PA, USA.
Maureen E MorkDepartment of Clinical Cancer Genetics, University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX, USA.
Aparajita SinghDepartment of Medicine, Division of Gastroenterology, University of California San Francisco, San Francisco, CA, USA.
Elena StoffelDivision of Gastroenterology, Department of Internal Medicine, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, MI, USA.
Jessica StollGastrointestinal Cancer Risk and Prevention Clinic, University of Chicago, Chicago, IL, USA.
Y Nancy YouDepartment of Clinical Cancer Genetics, University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX, USA.
Matthew B YurgelunDepartment of Medical Oncology, Dana-Farber Cancer Institute, Boston, MA, USA.
Sonia S KupferGastrointestinal Cancer Risk and Prevention Clinic, University of Chicago, Chicago, IL, USA.
Collaborative Group of the Americas on Inherited Gastrointestinal Cancer

Funding

Colonic responses to vitamin D and aspirin in African- and European-AmericansR01CA220329 · NCI · UNIVERSITY OF CHICAGO · PI KUPFER, SONIA · 2018 to 2022
$1.9M
NCI NIH HHS R01 CA220329
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Multigene panel tests for hereditary cancer syndromes are increasingly utilized in the care of colorectal cancer (CRC) and polyposis patients. However, widespread availability of panels raises a number of questions including which patients should undergo testing, which genes should be included on panels, and the settings in which panels should be ordered and interpreted. To address this knowledge gap, key questions regarding the major issues encountered in clinical evaluation of hereditary CRC and polyposis were designed by the Collaborative Group of the Americas on Inherited Gastrointestinal Cancer Position Statement Committee and leadership. A literature search was conducted to address these questions. Recommendations were based on the best available evidence and expert opinion. This position statement addresses which genes should be included on a multigene panel for a patient with a suspected hereditary CRC or polyposis syndrome, proposes updated genetic testing criteria, discusses testing approaches for patients with mismatch repair proficient or deficient CRC, and outlines the essential elements for ordering and disclosing multigene panel test results. We acknowledge that critical gaps in access, insurance coverage, resources, and education remain barriers to high-quality, equitable care for individuals and their families at increased risk of hereditary CRC.

Indexed as

DNA Mismatch RepairAdenomatous Polyposis ColiAge FactorsColorectal NeoplasmsGastrointestinal NeoplasmsGenetic CounselingGenetic TestingHumansMiddle AgedNeoplastic Syndromes, HereditaryInherited colorectal cancerLynch syndromeMultigene panel testingNext-generation sequencingPolyposisPosition statement

Identifiers

PMID32172433
PMCPMC7326311

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.