Evidence map›Paper›PMID 32172425›Full record

Trial reportJournal of interventional cardiac electrophysiology : an international journal of arrhythmias and pacing2021

Clinical course of sinus node dysfunction after thoracoscopic surgery for atrial fibrillation-analysis of the Atrial Fibrillation Ablation and Autonomic Modulation via Thoracoscopic Surgery (AFACT) study.

Jolien Neefs, Shaëlle A Ons, Wouter R Berger, Sébastien P J Krul, Nicoline W E van den Berg, Femke R Piersma, Marcel A M Beijk, WimJan P van Boven, Antoine H G Driessen, Joris R de Groot

Open access · hybridAbstract readRandomized Controlled Trial
In one paragraph

Trial report in Journal of interventional cardiac electrophysiology : an international journal of arrhythmias and pacing, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
0.3field-weighted citation impact, top 41% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed, 2 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Thoracoscopic surgical atrial fibrillation ablation in patients with an extremely enlarged left atrium.Journal of interventional cardiac electrophysiology : an international journal of arrhythmias and pacing · 2022
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

10 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Jolien NeefsDepartment of Cardiology, Heart Center, Amsterdam UMC, University of Amsterdam, Amsterdam, The Netherlands.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-8733-0867
Shaëlle A OnsDepartment of Cardiology, Heart Center, Amsterdam UMC, University of Amsterdam, Amsterdam, The Netherlands.
Wouter R BergerDepartment of Cardiology, Heart Center, Amsterdam UMC, University of Amsterdam, Amsterdam, The Netherlands.
Sébastien P J KrulDepartment of Cardiology, Heart Center, Amsterdam UMC, University of Amsterdam, Amsterdam, The Netherlands.
Nicoline W E van den BergDepartment of Cardiology, Heart Center, Amsterdam UMC, University of Amsterdam, Amsterdam, The Netherlands.
Femke R PiersmaDepartment of Cardiology, Heart Center, Amsterdam UMC, University of Amsterdam, Amsterdam, The Netherlands.
Marcel A M BeijkDepartment of Cardiology, Heart Center, Amsterdam UMC, University of Amsterdam, Amsterdam, The Netherlands.
WimJan P van BovenDepartment of Cardiothoracic Surgery, Heart Center, Amsterdam UMC, University of Amsterdam, Amsterdam, The Netherlands.
Antoine H G DriessenDepartment of Cardiothoracic Surgery, Heart Center, Amsterdam UMC, University of Amsterdam, Amsterdam, The Netherlands.
Joris R de GrootDepartment of Cardiology, Heart Center, Amsterdam UMC, University of Amsterdam, Amsterdam, The Netherlands. j.r.degroot@amsterdamumc.nl.
Amsterdam University Medical Centers · NLAmsterdam Neuroscience · NL

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

purposeSinus node dysfunction (SND) may complicate thoracoscopic surgical atrial fibrillation (AF) ablation. Identifying patients at risk is important, as SND may require temporary or permanent pacing. To determine the incidence of postoperative SND and duration of symptoms in patients who underwent thoracoscopic surgical ablation.

methodsPatients with paroxysmal or persistent AF included in the Atrial Fibrillation Ablation and Autonomic Modulation via Thoracoscopic Surgery (AFACT) study underwent pulmonary vein isolation and additional left atrial ablations on indication. Patients were randomized to ganglion plexus ablation or control. SND was defined as symptomatic or asymptomatic junctional rhythm exceeding sinus rate within 30 days postoperatively. The SND risk was assessed by using a univariable logistic regression model. The rate of pacemaker implantation was determined.

resultsThe AFACT study included 240 patients. SND developed in 17 (7.1%) patients, not affected by randomized treatment, p = 0.18. SND patients more often had persistent AF (88.2%) than patients without SND (57.4%), p = 0.01. After univariable testing, persistent AF (OR 5.57 CI 1.52-35.90, p = 0.02) and additional left atrial ablations (OR 12.10 CI 2.40-220.20, p = 0.02) were associated with postoperative SND. Six (35.3%) patients needed temporary pacing for 1-7 days; permanent pacemakers (PMs) were implanted for SND in five (29.4%) patients.

conclusionAdditional left atrial ablations strongly increase the SND risk. The majority of SND was temporary, and sinus rhythm resolved within days, which indicates that a conservative approach with regard to pacemaker implantation should be considered.

Indexed as

Atrial FibrillationCatheter AblationPulmonary VeinsHumansSick Sinus SyndromeThoracoscopyTreatment OutcomeAtrial fibrosisGanglion plexusPulmonary vein isolationSurgical ablationThoracoscopic surgery

Identifiers

PMID32172425
PMCPMC7925456
OpenAlexW3011405431

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.