Evidence map›Paper›PMID 32172407›Full record

ArticleSupportive care in cancer : official journal of the Multinational Association of Supportive Care in Cancer2020

Healthcare resource utilization and costs associated with acute graft-versus-host disease following allogeneic hematopoietic cell transplantation.

Jingbo Yu, Lincy Lal, Amy Anderson, Mary DuCharme, Shreekant Parasuraman, Daniel Weisdorf

Abstract read
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in Supportive care in cancer : official journal of the Multinational Association of Supportive Care in Cancer, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 10 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
10citing papers in PubMed
1.3field-weighted citation impact, top 18% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

10 citing papers in PubMed, 15 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Posttransplant cells for the win? DLI and adoptive cell therapy to eradicate MRD.Hematology. American Society of Hematology. Education Program · 2025
    Review
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.

Jingbo YuUS Medical Affairs, Incyte Corporation, 1801 Augustine Cut-Off, Wilmington, DE, 19803, USA. jyu@incyte.com.
Lincy LalOptum, Inc., 11000 Optum Circle, Eden Prairie, MN, 55344, USA.
Amy AndersonOptum, Inc., 11000 Optum Circle, Eden Prairie, MN, 55344, USA.
Mary DuCharmeOptum, Inc., 11000 Optum Circle, Eden Prairie, MN, 55344, USA.
Shreekant ParasuramanUS Medical Affairs, Incyte Corporation, 1801 Augustine Cut-Off, Wilmington, DE, 19803, USA.
Daniel WeisdorfUniversity of Minnesota, 516 Delaware St SE, Minneapolis, MN, 55455, USA.
Optum (United States) · USIncyte (United States) · USUniversity of Minnesota · US

Funding

Incyte Corporation N/A
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

purposeThe contribution of acute graft-versus-host disease (GVHD) to healthcare resource utilization (HCRU) and costs following allogeneic hematopoietic cell transplantation (HCT) has not been extensively investigated. The objective of this study was to estimate both inpatient and outpatient HCRU and costs associated with acute GVHD during the 100-day and 1-year periods after allogeneic HCT in the USA.

methodsA retrospective analysis of administrative claims from the Optum® Research Database of patients aged ≥ 12 years who received HCT between 2010 and 2016 was conducted. Costs and HCRU among patients with acute GVHD and no GVHD were compared during the 100-day (acute GVHD, n = 723; no GVHD, n = 385) and 360-day (acute GVHD, n = 445; no GVHD, n = 227) periods after HCT.

resultsPatients with acute GVHD had significantly more (P < 0.001) mean office visits (47 vs 32), hospital outpatient visits (71 vs 35), and inpatient stays (2.8 vs 1.1) than patients with no GVHD during 360 days post-HCT; similar findings were observed over the 100-day period. Mean total all-cause costs were significantly higher (P < 0.001) for patients with acute GVHD versus no GVHD during both post-HCT periods (100-day, $316,458 vs $215,229; 360-day, $466,720 vs $263,568). Additional factors associated with increased 360-day costs included young age (12-17 years; P < 0.001) and peripheral blood as graft source (P = 0.03).

conclusionAcute GVHD was associated with significant HCRU and costs in the first 100 days of transplant, increasing over the first year post-HCT. Inpatient care was the primary driver, but outpatient care and related costs were also increased.

Indexed as

AdolescentAdultAgedChildFemaleGraft vs Host DiseaseHealth ResourcesHematopoietic Stem Cell TransplantationHumansMaleMiddle AgedPatient Acceptance of Health CareRetrospective StudiesTransplantation, HomologousUnited StatesYoung AdultAcute graft-versus-host diseaseAllogeneic hematopoietic cell transplantationInpatient healthcare resource utilizationTotal costs

Identifiers

PMID32172407
OpenAlexW3011238051

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.