Evidence map›Paper›PMID 32172402›Full record

ArticleNeurological sciences : official journal of the Italian Neurological Society and of the Italian Society of Clinical Neurophysiology2020

Psychosocial repercussion of migraine: is it a stigmatized disease?

A Martínez-Fernández, M Rueda Vega, S Quintas, M de Toledo Heras, J Díaz de Terán, G Latorre González, O Trabajos García, J Vivancos Mora, A B Gago-Veiga

Abstract read
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in Neurological sciences : official journal of the Italian Neurological Society and of the Italian Society of Clinical Neurophysiology, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 10 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
10citing papers in PubMed
2.4field-weighted citation impact, top 11% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

10 citing papers in PubMed, 28 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Observational
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. Review
  5. Observational
  6. Observational
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.

A Martínez-FernándezHospital Universitario de La Princesa, Universidad Autónoma de Madrid, Calle Diego de León 62, 28006, Madrid, Spain.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-2313-4437
M Rueda VegaHospital Universitario de La Princesa, Universidad Autónoma de Madrid, Calle Diego de León 62, 28006, Madrid, Spain.
S QuintasHeadache Unit, Department of Neurology, Instituto de Investigación Sanitaria, Hospital Universitario de la Princesa, Calle Diego de León 62, 28006, Madrid, Spain.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-0622-8228
M de Toledo HerasEpilepsy Unit, Department of Neurology, Instituto de Investigación Sanitaria, Hospital Universitario de la Princesa, Madrid, Spain.
J Díaz de TeránHeadache Unit, Department of Neurology, Hospital Universitario de La Paz, Madrid, Spain.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-0064-6269
G Latorre GonzálezHeadache Unit, Department of Neurology, Hospital Universitario de Fuenlabrada, Fuenlabrada, Spain.
O Trabajos GarcíaHeadache Unit, Department of Neurology, Hospital Universitario de Fuenlabrada, Fuenlabrada, Spain.
J Vivancos MoraHeadache Unit, Department of Neurology, Instituto de Investigación Sanitaria, Hospital Universitario de la Princesa, Calle Diego de León 62, 28006, Madrid, Spain.
A B Gago-VeigaHeadache Unit, Department of Neurology, Instituto de Investigación Sanitaria, Hospital Universitario de la Princesa, Calle Diego de León 62, 28006, Madrid, Spain. dra.anagago@gmail.com.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-0038-3406
Hospital Universitario de La Princesa · ESHospital Universitario de Fuenlabrada · ESHospital Universitario La Paz · ES

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

introductionStigma manifests both in prejudices and rejection from society towards patients who suffer from a specific pathology, and by patient's internalization of this discrimination, with the consequent repercussions on their state of mind and quality of life. The aim of the study was to quantify the stigma associated with migraine and analyze whether it is related to the clinical-demographic characteristics of the patients, as well as the possible impact on their daily lives. MATERIALS AND

methodsThe stigma scale for chronic illness (SSCI) and other questionnaires were administered to 56 patients with episodic migraine (EM), 18 with chronic migraine (CM), and 21 with epilepsy, as a control group.

resultsThe mean SSCI score was higher (51.6 ± 15.0) in the CM group than in the EM (45.0 ± 13.5) and epilepsy (47.6 ± 15.5) groups, without reaching statistical significance. In addition, the score was higher in patients who were unemployed, divorced, and in those who had migraine with aura. A statistically significant correlation was found between the SSCI score and the impact of migraine on daily life, the presence of stress, anxiety and depression, and low self-esteem.

conclusionsThere is a stigma around migraine in our society, which seems to be more prevalent in patients with certain socio-demographic characteristics, and that is related to stress, mood alterations, and low self-esteem. Trying to reduce stigma could contribute to improve the control of migraine and reduce the impact of the disease at a socio-economic level.

Indexed as

Migraine DisordersQuality of LifeAnxietyHumansSocial StigmaSurveys and QuestionnairesAnxietyDepressionMigraineSelf-esteemStigma

Identifiers

PMID32172402
OpenAlexW3011111665

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.