ArticleThe European journal of health economics : HEPAC : health economics in prevention and care2020
Healthcare expenditure and carbon footprint in the USA: evidence from hidden cointegration approach.
Article in The European journal of health economics : HEPAC : health economics in prevention and care, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. An erratum has been issued. Cited by 10 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
10 citing papers in PubMed.
- Modeling the impact of environmental and socioeconomic factors on health expenditure in Türkiye.iScience · 2026Article
- Accounting for health expenditures, migration, and CO₂ emissions in the EU: a bidirectional analysis.Frontiers in public health · 2026Article
- Spatio-temporal variations in carbon sources, sinks and footprints of cropland ecosystems in the Middle and Lower Yangtze River Plain of China, 2013-2022.Scientific reports · 2025Article
- The climate emergency for rheumatologists: where do we stand?Clinical rheumatology · 2025Review
- The nexus among COEnvironmental science and pollution research international · 2024Article
- The Relationship Between Health Expenditure, COJournal of the knowledge economy · 2023Article
- Global evidence of environmental and lifestyle effects on medical expenditures across 154 countries.Preventive medicine reports · 2022Article
- Health expenditures, environmental quality, and economic development: State-of-the-art review and findings in the context of COP26.Frontiers in public health · 2022Article
- Do renewable energy and health expenditures improve load capacity factor in the USA and Japan? A new approach to environmental issues.The European journal of health economics : HEPAC : health economics in prevention and care · 2021Article
- Consequences of Information and Communication Technologies and Environmental Degradation on Health Expenditure.Inquiry : a journal of medical care organization, provision and financingArticle
Corrections and comments
- Erratum issued
Authors and funding
1 author.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
The priority aim of this study is to investigate the effect of carbon footprint, which is an indicator of environmental degradation, on health expenditures for the USA. In the study, cointegration analysis was performed for the period 1970-2016 by using health expenditures, carbon footprint, gross domestic product per capita and life expectancy at birth variables. According to the results of standard cointegration analysis, only cointegration relationship between health expenditures and income was found. In the models with carbon footprint, no cointegration relationship was discovered between the original values of the variables. This result was approached with suspicion, and it was thought that there might be a hidden cointegration between healthcare expenditures and carbon footprint. For this purpose, the hidden cointegration analysis and crouching error correction model proposed by Granger and Yoon [18] were employed among the positive and negative components of the variables of healthcare expenditures and carbon footprint. The results of the hidden cointegration analysis revealed that there was a hidden cointegration relationship between the positive components of healthcare expenditures and the positive components of carbon footprint. Analysis results show that a 1% increase in carbon footprint will cause a 2.04% increase in healthcare expenditures in the long term in the USA. When the positive components of the variables were considered, it was concluded that there was a one-way long-term asymmetric causality relationship between carbon footprint and healthcare expenditures. As a result of the study, it was proposed that the carbon footprint should be diminished to prevent the increasing burden of the healthcare expenditures on the budget.
Indexed as
Identifiers
32172391What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.