ArticleInternational journal of colorectal disease2020
Long-term outcomes of single-incision laparoscopic technique in Soave procedure compared with heart-shaped anastomosis for Hirschsprung disease.
Article in International journal of colorectal disease, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
6 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 9 citations in OpenAlex.
- Single-incision laparoscopic endorectal pull-through for Hirschsprung disease: a prospective institutional study and systematic review with meta-analysis.Surgical endoscopy · 2025Pooled it
- Safety and feasibility of one-stage neonatal approach for short-segment Hirschsprung's disease.PloS one · 2026Article
- Comparison of robot-assisted and laparoscopic-assisted modified Soave short muscle cuff anastomosis surgeries for classical Hirschsprung disease.BMC surgery · 2025Article
- Clinical efficacy of the laparoscopic modified Soave procedure for Hirschsprung's disease: a comparative retrospective cohort study.Frontiers in pediatrics · 2025Article
- Identification and validation of the common pathogenesis and hub biomarkers in Hirschsprung disease complicated with Crohn's disease.Frontiers in immunology · 2022Article
- Suspension sutures facilitate single-incision laparoscopic-assisted rectal pull-through for Hirschsprung disease.BMC surgery · 2021Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
Abstract
purposeThis retrospective study compared the long-term outcomes of single-incision laparoscopy-assisted Soave procedure (SILSP) with single-incision laparoscopy-assisted heart-shaped anastomosis (SILHSA) in patients with Hirschsprung disease (HSCR).
methodsPatients diagnosed with HSCR that underwent SILSP or SILHSA between January 2009 and January 2015 at our institute were enrolled in this retrospective study. Data on the clinical characteristics, perioperative complications, and postoperative quality of life were retrospectively collected and analyzed.
resultsThere were 109 patients in the SILSP group and 95 patients in the SILHSA group. No differences in clinical characteristics, including age, weight, hospitalization length, blood loss volume, and operation time, were noted between the two groups. The incidence rates of constipation and soiling were lower in the SILHSA group than those in the SILSP group. The SILHSA group showed lower scores in constipation and soiling compared with the SILSP group, indicating a better surgical outcome for patients receiving SILHSA procedure.
conclusionSILHSA is a feasible and reliable minimally invasive surgical procedure for patients with HSCR. Patients who underwent SILHSA had lower incidence rates of constipation and soiling than patients who underwent SILSP, suggesting that SILHSA could be a better choice for patients with HSCR.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.