Evidence map›Paper›PMID 32172299›Full record

ReviewCurrent oncology reports2020

Chronic Lymphocytic Leukaemia in 2020: the Future Has Arrived.

Kate Milne, Beattie Sturrock, Timothy Chevassut

Open access · hybridAbstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Current oncology reports, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 16 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
16citing papers in PubMed
3.1field-weighted citation impact, top 8% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

16 citing papers in PubMed, 30 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Review
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Fashion in haematology and wine.Bone marrow transplantation · 2022
    Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Review
  14. Article
  15. Review
  16. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.

Kate MilneBrighton and Sussex Medical School, University of Sussex, Brighton, BN1 9PS, UK. kate.milne5@nhs.net.
Beattie SturrockBrighton and Sussex Medical School, University of Sussex, Brighton, BN1 9PS, UK.
Timothy ChevassutBrighton and Sussex Medical School, University of Sussex, Brighton, BN1 9PS, UK.
Brighton and Sussex Medical School · GBRoyal Sussex County Hospital · GBUniversity of Sussex · GB

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

purpose of reviewChronic lymphocytic leukaemia is now recognised as a heterogenous disease with a variety of clinical outcomes. Here we summarise the way it is currently stratified according to genetic risk and patient characteristics and the treatment approaches used for these different subgroups. RECENT

findingsCertain patients appear to sustain MRD negativity after combination chemoimmunotherapy, leading to the suggestion that their CLL may be cured. However, 17p-deleted, p53-mutated or IGHV-UM subgroups are generally resistant to FCR, and much better responses are seen with ibrutinib and venetoclax, frequently inducing MRD negativity that hopefully will be translated into durable remissions. Small molecule inhibitors have already revolutionised CLL treatment. Going forward, we anticipate their use in the majority of patients, early after diagnosis and with curative intent.

Indexed as

Chromosome DeletionMutationAntineoplastic Combined Chemotherapy ProtocolsChromosomes, Human, Pair 17CyclophosphamideHumansLeukemia, Lymphocytic, Chronic, B-CellRituximabTumor Suppressor Protein p53VidarabineCyclophosphamidefludarabineRituximabTumor Suppressor Protein p53VidarabineChemoimmunotherapyChronic lymphocytic leukaemiaFutureIbrutinibVenetoclax

Identifiers

PMID32172299
PMCPMC7072049
OpenAlexW3012263096

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.