Evidence map›Paper›PMID 32172276›Full record

ArticleMedical science monitor : international medical journal of experimental and clinical research2020

Use of Electrical Impedance Tomography (EIT) to Estimate Global and Regional Lung Recruitment Volume (VREC) Induced by Positive End-Expiratory Pressure (PEEP): An Experiment in Pigs with Lung Injury.

Yu-Mei Wang, Xiu-Mei Sun, Yi-Min Zhou, Jing-Ran Chen, Kun-Ming Cheng, Hong-Liang Li, Yan-Lin Yang, Linlin Zhang, Jian-Xin Zhou

Open access · hybridAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Medical science monitor : international medical journal of experimental and clinical research, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
3citing papers in PubMed
0.5field-weighted citation impact, top 31% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

3 citing papers in PubMed, 6 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Review
  2. Review
  3. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Yu-Mei WangDepartment of Critical Care Medicine, Beijing Tiantan Hospital, Capital Medical University, Beijing, China (mainland).
Xiu-Mei SunDepartment of Critical Care Medicine, Beijing Tiantan Hospital, Capital Medical University, Beijing, China (mainland).
Yi-Min ZhouDepartment of Critical Care Medicine, Beijing Tiantan Hospital, Capital Medical University, Beijing, China (mainland).
Jing-Ran ChenDepartment of Critical Care Medicine, Beijing Tiantan Hospital, Capital Medical University, Beijing, China (mainland).
Kun-Ming ChengDepartment of Critical Care Medicine, Beijing Tiantan Hospital, Capital Medical University, Beijing, China (mainland).
Hong-Liang LiDepartment of Critical Care Medicine, Beijing Tiantan Hospital, Capital Medical University, Beijing, China (mainland).
Yan-Lin YangDepartment of Critical Care Medicine, Beijing Tiantan Hospital, Capital Medical University, Beijing, China (mainland).
Linlin ZhangDepartment of Critical Care Medicine, Beijing Tiantan Hospital, Capital Medical University, Beijing, China (mainland).
Jian-Xin ZhouDepartment of Critical Care Medicine, Beijing Tiantan Hospital, Capital Medical University, Beijing, China (mainland).
Capital Medical University · CN

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

BACKGROUND Electrical impedance tomography (EIT) is a real-time tool used to monitor lung volume change at the bedside, which could be used to measure lung recruitment volume (VREC) for setting positive end-expiratory pressure (PEEP). We assessed and compared the agreement in VREC measurement with the EIT method versus the flow-derived method. MATERIAL AND METHODS In 12 Bama pigs, lung injury was induced by tracheal instillation of hydrochloric acid and verified by an arterial partial pressure of oxygen to inspired oxygen fraction ratio below 200 mmHg. During the end-expiratory occlusion, an airway release maneuver was conduct at 5 and 15 cmH₂O of PEEP. VREC was measured by flow-integrated PEEP-induced lung volume change (flow-derived method) and end-expiratory lung impedance change (EIT-derived method). Linear regression and Bland-Altman analysis were used to test the correlation and agreement between these 2 measures. RESULTS Lung injury was successfully induced in all the animals. EIT-derived VREC was significantly correlated with flow-derived VREC (R²=0.650, p=0.002). The bias (the lower and upper limits of agreement) was -19 (-182 to 144) ml. The median (interquartile range) of EIT-derived VREC was 322 (218-469) ml, with 110 (59-142) ml and 194 (157-307) ml in dependent and nondependent lung regions, respectively. Global and regional respiratory system compliance increased significantly at high PEEP compared to those at low PEEP. CONCLUSIONS Close correlation and agreement were found between EIT-derived and flow-derived VREC measurements. The advantages of EIT-derived recruitability assessment included the avoidance of ventilation interruption and the ability to provide regional recruitment information.

Indexed as

AnimalsElectric ImpedanceFeasibility StudiesHumansLungLung InjuryMonitoring, PhysiologicPositive-Pressure RespirationSwineSwine, MiniatureTidal VolumeTomography

Identifiers

PMID32172276
PMCPMC7094060
OpenAlexW3011313254

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.