Evidence map›Paper›PMID 32172039›Full record

ArticleJournal of psychosomatic research2020

Manipulating sleep duration perception changes cognitive performance - An exploratory analysis.

Shadab A Rahman, Dharmishta Rood, Natalie Trent, Jo Solet, Ellen J Langer, Steven W Lockley

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of psychosomatic research, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 11 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
11citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

11 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Trial
  2. Article
  3. Observational
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Review
  10. Article
  11. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Shadab A RahmanDivision of Sleep and Circadian Disorders, Departments of Medicine and Neurology, Brigham and Women's Hospital, Boston, MA 02115, United States of America; Division of Sleep Medicine, Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA 02115, United States of America. Electronic address: sarahman@rics.bwh.harvard.edu.
Dharmishta RoodDepartment of Psychology, Harvard University, Cambridge, MA 02139, United States of America.
Natalie TrentDepartment of Psychology, Harvard University, Cambridge, MA 02139, United States of America.
Jo SoletDivision of Sleep Medicine, Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA 02115, United States of America; Department of Medicine, Cambridge Health Alliance, Cambridge, MA 02139, United States of America.
Ellen J LangerDepartment of Psychology, Harvard University, Cambridge, MA 02139, United States of America.
Steven W LockleyDivision of Sleep and Circadian Disorders, Departments of Medicine and Neurology, Brigham and Women's Hospital, Boston, MA 02115, United States of America; Division of Sleep Medicine, Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA 02115, United States of America.

Funding

Harvard Clinical and Translational Science CenterUL1TR001102 · NCATS · HARVARD MEDICAL SCHOOL · PI NADLER, LEE MARSHALL · 2013 to 2017
$106.2M
Harvard Clinical and Translational Science Center (UL1)UL1TR000170 · NCATS · HARVARD MEDICAL SCHOOL · PI NADLER, LEE MARSHALL · 2012 to 2013
$31.4M
TRAINING IN SLEEP, CIRCADIAN &RESPIRATORY NEUROBIOLOGYT32HL007901 · NHLBI · BRIGHAM AND WOMEN'S HOSPITAL · PI Charles A Czeisler · 1998 to 2026
$18.5M
NCATS NIH HHS UL1 TR000170NCATS NIH HHS UL1 TR001102NHLBI NIH HHS T32 HL007901
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

objectivesTo test the effect of perceived sleep duration on cognitive performance.

methodsSixteen healthy individuals [8F; mean age (± SD): 24.2 ± 3.0 years)] received an 8-h sleep opportunity followed by a 5-h opportunity on two consecutive nights. Upon waking, they were randomized to being informed that they received either an 8-h or 5-h sleep opportunity, via a clock that ran either fast, slow or normally. Cognitive performance was assessed using 10-min auditory psychomotor vigilance tests and subjective sleepiness ratings. Homeostatic and circadian sleep drive was assessed using waking electroencephalography (EEG).

resultsReaction time was significantly quicker when individuals thought that they had slept for 8 h but given a 5-h sleep opportunity. Conversely, reaction times were significantly slower when individuals thought they had 5 h of sleep but given an 8-h sleep opportunity. EEG delta power (1.0-4.5 Hz) during wake increased significantly when sleep was restricted to 5 h, and individuals thought they slept for 5 h, but this increase was attenuated with a perceived sleep duration of 8 h following a 5-h opportunity. EEG delta power did not increase, however, with perceived sleep restriction. EEG high-alpha activity (10.5-11.5 Hz) was consistently higher when participants thought that they had an 8-h sleep opportunity, regardless of the actual duration.

conclusionsThese results suggest that perceived sleep duration may modulate psychosomatic responses. Additional studies with predefined outcomes and analyses are necessary to confirm these findings, which may have important implications for understanding how sleep affects cognition and psychosomatic responses.

Indexed as

AdultCognitionFemaleHumansMalePerceptionSleepSleep DeprivationWakefulnessYoung AdultAlertnessCognitionFalse-clock paradigmPerceived timeSleep

Identifiers

PMID32172039
PMCPMC7568839

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.