ArticleAddictive behaviors2020
If at first you don't succeed, when should you try again? A prospective study of failed quit attempts and subsequent smoking cessation.
Article in Addictive behaviors, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
5 citing papers in PubMed.
- Comparative Effectiveness of Cytisinicline and Varenicline for Smoking Cessation: A Matching-Adjusted Indirect Comparison (MAIC).Journal of health economics and outcomes research · 2026Article
- Estimating the likelihood of cigarette maintenance and dual use among people using e-cigarettes for cigarette cessation: Analysis of the Population Assessment of Tobacco and Health Study Waves 5 and 6.Addictive behaviors · 2025Article
- Utilization and Experiences of Using Quit Now, a Nicotine and Tobacco Smoking Cessation Website: Thematic Analysis.Journal of medical Internet research · 2025Article
- Comparison of the baseline characteristics and influencing factors of successful smoking cessation before and during the coronavirus disease pandemic.Tobacco induced diseases · 2023Article
- The Prevalence of Metabolic Syndrome and Health-Related Behavior Changes: The Korea National Health Examination Survey.Healthcare (Basel, Switzerland) · 2020Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
Abstract
objectiveTo assess the association between likelihood of success of smoking cessation attempts and time since most recent attempt.
methodsProspective study of 823 smokers who reported a failed quit attempt in the last 12 months at baseline and ≥1 quit attempt over 6-month follow-up. The input variable was time in months between the end (and in an exploratory analysis, the start) of the most recent failed quit attempt reported retrospectively at baseline and start of the first attempt made during the 6-month follow-up period. The outcome variable was success in the latter quit attempt.
resultsSuccess rates for failed quitters who waited <3, 3-6, and 6-12 months between their failed quit attempt ending and making a subsequent quit attempt were 13.8%, 17.5%, and 19.0% respectively. After adjustment for covariates, the odds of cessation relative to those who made a subsequent quit attempt within 3 months were 1.42 (95%CI 0.79-2.55) and 1.52 (95%CI 0.81-2.86) for those who waited 3-6 and 6-12 months respectively before trying again. Bayes factors indicated the data were insensitive. The exploratory analysis showed the odds of cessation were 1.55 (95%CI 0.78-3.08), 1.92 (95%CI 0.94-3.92), and 2.47 (95%CI 1.04-5.83) greater for those with an interval of 3-6, 6-12, and 12-18 months respectively than those who tried again within 3 months.
conclusionsWhile pre-planned analyses were inconclusive, exploratory analysis of retrospective reports of quit attempts and success suggested the likelihood of success of quit attempts may be positively associated with number of months since beginning a prior quit attempt. However, only the longest inter-quit interval examined (12-18 months) was associated with significantly greater odds of quit success relative to a <3 month interval in fully adjusted models; all other comparisons were inconclusive.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.