Evidence map›Paper›PMID 32171725›Full record

ArticleRedox biology2020

Yeast β-D-glucan exerts antitumour activity in liver cancer through impairing autophagy and lysosomal function, promoting reactive oxygen species production and apoptosis.

Ningning Wang, Hongzhi Liu, Guijun Liu, Min Li, Xuxiao He, Chunzhao Yin, Qiaochu Tu, Xia Shen, Wenqiang Bai, Qiang Wang and 2 more

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Redox biology, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 38 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
38citing papers in PubMed
6.7field-weighted citation impact, top 2% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

38 citing papers in PubMed, 77 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. A β‑1,3‑1,6‑glucan fromMolecular medicine reports · 2026
    Article
  3. Article
  4. [ATPase HZhonghua gan zang bing za zhi = Zhonghua ganzangbing zazhi = Chinese journal of hepatology · 2026
    Article
  5. Review
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Review
  9. Review
  10. Review
  11. Review
  12. Article
  13. Review
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Review
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

12 authors at 6 institutions in 1 country.

Ningning WangKey Laboratory of Nutrition, Metabolism and Food Safety, Shanghai Institute of Nutrition and Health, Shanghai Institutes for Biological Sciences (SIBS), Chinese Academy of Sciences (CAS), Shanghai, 200031, China; University of the Chinese Academy of Sciences, CAS, Beijing, 10049, China.
Hongzhi LiuInstitute of Food Science and Technology, Chinese Academy of Agricultural Sciences, Beijing, 100193, China.
Guijun LiuKey Laboratory of Nutrition, Metabolism and Food Safety, Shanghai Institute of Nutrition and Health, Shanghai Institutes for Biological Sciences (SIBS), Chinese Academy of Sciences (CAS), Shanghai, 200031, China; University of the Chinese Academy of Sciences, CAS, Beijing, 10049, China.
Min LiKey Laboratory of Nutrition, Metabolism and Food Safety, Shanghai Institute of Nutrition and Health, Shanghai Institutes for Biological Sciences (SIBS), Chinese Academy of Sciences (CAS), Shanghai, 200031, China; University of the Chinese Academy of Sciences, CAS, Beijing, 10049, China.
Xuxiao HeKey Laboratory of Nutrition, Metabolism and Food Safety, Shanghai Institute of Nutrition and Health, Shanghai Institutes for Biological Sciences (SIBS), Chinese Academy of Sciences (CAS), Shanghai, 200031, China; University of the Chinese Academy of Sciences, CAS, Beijing, 10049, China.
Chunzhao YinUniversity of the Chinese Academy of Sciences, CAS, Beijing, 10049, China; School of Life Science and Technology, ShanghaiTech University, Shanghai, 201210, China.
Qiaochu TuUniversity of the Chinese Academy of Sciences, CAS, Beijing, 10049, China; School of Life Science and Technology, ShanghaiTech University, Shanghai, 201210, China.
Xia ShenUniversity of the Chinese Academy of Sciences, CAS, Beijing, 10049, China; School of Life Science and Technology, ShanghaiTech University, Shanghai, 201210, China.
Wenqiang BaiInstitute of Food Science and Technology, Chinese Academy of Agricultural Sciences, Beijing, 100193, China.
Qiang WangInstitute of Food Science and Technology, Chinese Academy of Agricultural Sciences, Beijing, 100193, China. Electronic address: wangqiang06@caas.cn.
Yongzhen TaoKey Laboratory of Nutrition, Metabolism and Food Safety, Shanghai Institute of Nutrition and Health, Shanghai Institutes for Biological Sciences (SIBS), Chinese Academy of Sciences (CAS), Shanghai, 200031, China; University of the Chinese Academy of Sciences, CAS, Beijing, 10049, China. Electronic address: yztao01@sibs.ac.c.
Huiyong YinKey Laboratory of Nutrition, Metabolism and Food Safety, Shanghai Institute of Nutrition and Health, Shanghai Institutes for Biological Sciences (SIBS), Chinese Academy of Sciences (CAS), Shanghai, 200031, China; University of the Chinese Academy of Sciences, CAS, Beijing, 10049, China; Key Laboratory of Food Safety Risk Assessment, Ministry of Health, Beijing, China; School of Life Science and Technology, ShanghaiTech University, Shanghai, 201210, China. Electronic address: hyyin@sibs.ac.cn.
Chinese Academy of Agricultural Sciences · CNUniversity of Chinese Academy of Sciences · CNShanghai Institute of Nutrition and Health · CNShanghaiTech University · CNDeleted InstitutionShanghai Institutes for Biological Sciences · CN

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Autophagy is an evolutionarily conserved catabolic process that recycles proteins and organelles in a lysosome-dependent manner and is induced as an alternative source of energy and metabolites in response to diverse stresses. Inhibition of autophagy has emerged as an appealing therapeutic strategy in cancer. However, it remains to be explored whether autophagy inhibition is a viable approach for the treatment of hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC). Here, we identify that water-soluble yeast β-D-glucan (WSG) is a novel autophagy inhibitor and exerts significant antitumour efficacy on the inhibition of HCC cells proliferation and metabolism as well as the tumour growth in vivo. We further reveal that WSG inhibits autophagic degradation by increasing lysosomal pH and inhibiting lysosome cathepsins (cathepsin B and cathepsin D) activities, which results in the accumulation of damaged mitochondria and reactive oxygen species (ROS) production. Furthermore, WSG sensitizes HCC cells to apoptosis via the activation of caspase 8 and the transfer of truncated BID (tBID) into mitochondria under nutrient deprivation condition. Of note, administration of WSG as a single agent achieves a significant antitumour effect in xenograft mouse model and DEN/CCl

Indexed as

Carcinoma, HepatocellularLiver NeoplasmsAnimalsApoptosisAutophagyCell Line, TumorGlucansLysosomesMiceReactive Oxygen SpeciesSaccharomyces cerevisiaeGlucansReactive Oxygen SpeciesAntitumourAutophagy inhibitionHepatocellular carcinomaLysosomal functionβ-D-glucan

Identifiers

PMID32171725
PMCPMC7076095
OpenAlexW3009659574

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.