Evidence map›Paper›PMID 32171388›Full record

ArticleNeuron2020

Tracking the Mind's Eye: Primate Gaze Behavior during Virtual Visuomotor Navigation Reflects Belief Dynamics.

Kaushik J Lakshminarasimhan, Eric Avila, Erin Neyhart, Gregory C DeAngelis, Xaq Pitkow, Dora E Angelaki

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Neuron, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 33 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
33citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

33 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Review
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Review
  8. Adaptive algorithms for shaping behavior.PLoS computational biology · 2025
    Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Causal inference during closed-loop navigation: parsing of self- and object-motion.Philosophical transactions of the Royal Society of London. Series B, Biological sciences · 2023
    Article
  14. Self-motion perception and sequential decision-making: where are we heading?Philosophical transactions of the Royal Society of London. Series B, Biological sciences · 2023
    Review
  15. Article
  16. Review
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Making Sense of the Multiplicity and Dynamics of Navigational Codes in the Brain.The Journal of neuroscience : the official journal of the Society for Neuroscience · 2022
    Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Kaushik J LakshminarasimhanCenter for Neural Science, New York University, New York, NY, USA; Center for Theoretical Neuroscience, Columbia University, New York, NY, USA. Electronic address: jkl9@nyu.edu.
Eric AvilaCenter for Neural Science, New York University, New York, NY, USA.
Erin NeyhartDepartment of Neuroscience, Baylor College of Medicine, Houston, TX, USA.
Gregory C DeAngelisBrain and Cognitive Sciences, University of Rochester, Rochester, NY, USA.
Xaq PitkowDepartment of Neuroscience, Baylor College of Medicine, Houston, TX, USA; Department of Electrical and Computer Engineering, Rice University, Houston, TX, USA.
Dora E AngelakiCenter for Neural Science, New York University, New York, NY, USA; Tandon School of Engineering, New York University, New York, NY, USA.

Funding

NEURAL MECHANISMS OF VESTIBULAR FUNCTIONR01DC004260 · NIDCD · WASHINGTON UNIVERSITY · PI ANGELAKI, DORA · 1999 to 2025
$11.6M
Sensory Integration for Heading PerceptionR01EY016178 · NEI · WASHINGTON UNIVERSITY · PI GREGORY C DEANGELIS · 2005 to 2026
$7.8M
Neural correlates of 3D visual orientationR01EY022538 · NEI · NEW YORK UNIVERSITY · PI ANGELAKI, DORA · 2013 to 2021
$2.9M
Plasticity during visual/vestibular conflictR01DC014678 · NIDCD · NEW YORK UNIVERSITY · PI ANGELAKI, DORA · 2016 to 2020
$2.7M
Ensemble accumulator modeling of speed-accuracy tradeoff in visual searchF32EY025538 · NEI · VANDERBILT UNIVERSITY · PI MILLER, BRENT JEFFREY · 2016 to 2018
$173k
NEI NIH HHS F32 EY025538NEI NIH HHS R01 EY016178NEI NIH HHS R01 EY022538NIDCD NIH HHS R01 DC004260NIDCD NIH HHS R01 DC014678
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

To take the best actions, we often need to maintain and update beliefs about variables that cannot be directly observed. To understand the principles underlying such belief updates, we need tools to uncover subjects' belief dynamics from natural behavior. We tested whether eye movements could be used to infer subjects' beliefs about latent variables using a naturalistic navigation task. Humans and monkeys navigated to a remembered goal location in a virtual environment that provided optic flow but lacked explicit position cues. We observed eye movements that appeared to continuously track the goal location even when no visible target was present there. Accurate goal tracking was associated with improved task performance, and inhibiting eye movements in humans impaired navigation precision. These results suggest that gaze dynamics play a key role in action selection during challenging visuomotor behaviors and may possibly serve as a window into the subject's dynamically evolving internal beliefs.

Indexed as

Models, NeurologicalAdolescentAdultAnimalsDecision MakingFemaleFixation, OcularHumansMacaca mulattaMaleSpatial NavigationYoung Adult

Identifiers

PMID32171388
PMCPMC7323886

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.