Evidence map›Paper›PMID 32171248›Full record

ArticleBMC bioinformatics2020

Joining Illumina paired-end reads for classifying phylogenetic marker sequences.

Tsunglin Liu, Chen-Yu Chen, An Chen-Deng, Yi-Lin Chen, Jiu-Yao Wang, Yung-I Hou, Min-Ching Lin

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in BMC bioinformatics, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 9 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
9citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

9 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors.

Tsunglin LiuDepartment of Biotechnology and Bioindustry Sciences, National Cheng Kung University, Tainan, 701, Taiwan. tsunglin@mail.ncku.edu.tw.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-1026-1605
Chen-Yu ChenDepartment of Biotechnology and Bioindustry Sciences, National Cheng Kung University, Tainan, 701, Taiwan.
An Chen-DengDepartment of Biotechnology and Bioindustry Sciences, National Cheng Kung University, Tainan, 701, Taiwan.
Yi-Lin ChenMolecular Diagnostic Laboratory, Department of Pathology, National Cheng Kung University Hospital, Tainan, Taiwan.
Jiu-Yao WangCenter of Allergy and Clinical Immunology Research, College of Medicine, National Cheng Kung University, Tainan, Taiwan.
Yung-I HouCenter of Allergy and Clinical Immunology Research, College of Medicine, National Cheng Kung University, Tainan, Taiwan.
Min-Ching LinMolecular Diagnostic Laboratory, Department of Pathology, National Cheng Kung University Hospital, Tainan, Taiwan.

Funding

Ministry of Science and Technology, Taiwan 107-2221-E-006-198-MY2
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundIllumina sequencing of a marker gene is popular in metagenomic studies. However, Illumina paired-end (PE) reads sometimes cannot be merged into single reads for subsequent analysis. When mergeable PE reads are limited, one can simply use only first reads for taxonomy annotation, but that wastes information in the second reads. Presumably, including second reads should improve taxonomy annotation. However, a rigorous investigation of how best to do this and how much can be gained has not been reported.

resultsWe evaluated two methods of joining as opposed to merging PE reads into single reads for taxonomy annotation using simulated data with sequencing errors. Our rigorous evaluation involved several top classifiers (RDP classifier, SINTAX, and two alignment-based methods) and realistic benchmark datasets. For most classifiers, read joining ameliorated the impact of sequencing errors and improved the accuracy of taxonomy predictions. For alignment-based top-hit classifiers, rearranging the reference sequences is recommended to avoid improper alignments of joined reads. For word-counting classifiers, joined reads could be compared to the original reference for classification. We also applied read joining to our own real MiSeq PE data of nasal microbiota of asthmatic children. Before joining, trimming low quality bases was necessary for optimizing taxonomy annotation and sequence clustering. We then showed that read joining increased the amount of effective data for taxonomy annotation. Using these joined trimmed reads, we were able to identify two promising bacterial genera that might be associated with asthma exacerbation.

conclusionsWhen mergeable PE reads are limited, joining them into single reads for taxonomy annotation is always recommended. Reference sequences may need to be rearranged accordingly depending on the classifier. Read joining also relaxes the constraint on primer selection, and thus may unleash the full capacity of Illumina PE data for taxonomy annotation. Our work provides guidance for fully utilizing PE data of a marker gene when mergeable reads are limited.

Indexed as

PhylogenyAsthmaBacteriaChildCluster AnalysisGenetic MarkersHigh-Throughput Nucleotide SequencingHumansMetagenomeMetagenomicsMicrobiotaSequence Analysis, DNAGenetic Markers16SIllumina paired-endMetagenomicsRead joiningTaxonomy annotation

Identifiers

PMID32171248
PMCPMC7071698

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.