ArticleBMC bioinformatics2020
Machine learning prediction of oncology drug targets based on protein and network properties.
Article in BMC bioinformatics, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 27 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
27 citing papers in PubMed.
- Time-Resolved Transcriptomic Profiling of Chandipura Virus Infection Reveals Dynamic Host Responses and Host-Directed Therapeutic Targets.International journal of molecular sciences · 2026Article
- AI accelerate the identification of druggable targets by 3D structures of proteins and compounds.NPJ precision oncology · 2026Review
- Editorial: Use of bioinformatics in pharmacogenetics to optimize drug efficacy.Frontiers in pharmacology · 2026Article
- Discovery of Small Molecule Inhibitors against Polo-Like Kinase 1 Targeting Breast Cancer.Anti-cancer agents in medicinal chemistry · 2026Article
- Recent Advances and Emerging Directions in Machine Learning-Based Breast Cancer Drug Discovery: A Comprehensive Review.Breast cancer (Dove Medical Press) · 2026Review
- Exploring Artificial Intelligence's Potential to Enhance Conventional Anticancer Drug Development.Drug development research · 2025Review
- Cell reprogramming in cancer: Interplay of genetic, epigenetic mechanisms, and the tumor microenvironment in carcinogenesis and metastasis.World journal of clinical oncology · 2025Review
- Joint fusion of sequences and structures of drugs and targets for identifying targets based on intra and inter cross-attention mechanisms.BMC biology · 2025Article
- PRMT5 inhibition has a potent anti-tumor activity against adenoid cystic carcinoma of salivary glands.Journal of experimental & clinical cancer research : CR · 2025Article
- Target repositioning using multi-layer networks and machine learning: The case of prostate cancer.Computational and structural biotechnology journal · 2024Article
- Stopped clinical trials give evidence for the value of genetics.Nature genetics · 2024Article
- Article
- PINNED: identifying characteristics of druggable human proteins using an interpretable neural network.Journal of cheminformatics · 2023Article
- MOViDA: multiomics visible drug activity prediction with a biologically informed neural network model.Bioinformatics (Oxford, England) · 2023Article
- OncoRTT: Predicting novel oncology-related therapeutic targets using BERT embeddings and omics features.Frontiers in genetics · 2023Article
- Article
- ML-DTD: Machine Learning-Based Drug Target Discovery for the Potential Treatment of COVID-19.Vaccines · 2022Article
- Computational prediction and interpretation of druggable proteins using a stacked ensemble-learning framework.iScience · 2022Article
- A comprehensive review of artificial intelligence and network based approaches to drug repurposing in Covid-19.Biomedicine & pharmacotherapy = Biomedecine & pharmacotherapie · 2022Review
- Editorial: How pharmacogenomics, epigenetics, and data analysis could improve anticancer treatment?Frontiers in pharmacology · 2022Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors.
Funding
Abstract
backgroundThe selection and prioritization of drug targets is a central problem in drug discovery. Computational approaches can leverage the growing number of large-scale human genomics and proteomics data to make in-silico target identification, reducing the cost and the time needed.
resultsWe developed a machine learning approach to score proteins to generate a druggability score of novel targets. In our model we incorporated 70 protein features which included properties derived from the sequence, features characterizing protein functions as well as network properties derived from the protein-protein interaction network. The advantage of this approach is that it is unbiased and even less studied proteins with limited information about their function can score well as most of the features are independent of the accumulated literature. We build models on a training set which consist of targets with approved drugs and a negative set of non-drug targets. The machine learning techniques help to identify the most important combination of features differentiating validated targets from non-targets. We validated our predictions on an independent set of clinical trial drug targets, achieving a high accuracy characterized by an Area Under the Curve (AUC) of 0.89. Our most predictive features included biological function of proteins, network centrality measures, protein essentiality, tissue specificity, localization and solvent accessibility. Our predictions, based on a small set of 102 validated oncology targets, recovered the majority of known drug targets and identifies a novel set of proteins as drug target candidates.
conclusionsWe developed a machine learning approach to prioritize proteins according to their similarity to approved drug targets. We have shown that the method proposed is highly predictive on a validation dataset consisting of 277 targets of clinical trial drug confirming that our computational approach is an efficient and cost-effective tool for drug target discovery and prioritization. Our predictions were based on oncology targets and cancer relevant biological functions, resulting in significantly higher scores for targets of oncology clinical trial drugs compared to the scores of targets of trial drugs for other indications. Our approach can be used to make indication specific drug-target prediction by combining generic druggability features with indication specific biological functions.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.