Evidence map›Paper›PMID 32171152›Full record

ArticleClinical biomechanics (Bristol, Avon)2020

Tibial tuberosity anteriomedialization vs. medial patellofemoral ligament reconstruction for treatment of patellar instability related to malalignment: Computational simulation.

John J Elias, Miho J Tanaka, Kerwyn C Jones, Andrew J Cosgarea

Open access · greenAbstract readComparative Study
In one paragraph

Article in Clinical biomechanics (Bristol, Avon), 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
1.0field-weighted citation impact, top 28% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed, 13 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.

John J EliasDepartment of Research, Cleveland Clinic Akron General, 1 Akron General Ave, Akron, OH 44307, United States. Electronic address: eliasj@ccf.org.
Miho J TanakaDepartment of Orthopaedic Surgery, Johns Hopkins University, 10803 Falls Road, Suite 2100, Lutherville, MD 21093, United States. Electronic address: mtanaka5@mgh.harvard.edu.
Kerwyn C JonesDepartment of Orthopedic Surgery, Akron Children's Hospital, 1 Perkins Square, Akron, OH 44308, United States. Electronic address: kjones@akronchildrens.org.
Andrew J CosgareaDepartment of Orthopaedic Surgery, Johns Hopkins University, 10803 Falls Road, Suite 2100, Lutherville, MD 21093, United States. Electronic address: acosgar@jhmi.edu.
Johns Hopkins University · USAkron Children's Hospital · USCleveland Clinic · US

Funding

Computational Simulation of Dynamic Motion for Knees with Patellar Instability to Compare MPFL Reconstruction to Tibial Tuberosity Medialization as a Function of Knee AnatomyR21AR069150 · NIAMS · AKRON GENERAL MEDICAL CENTER · PI ELIAS, JOHN J · 2016 to 2017
$316k
NIAMS NIH HHS R21 AR069150
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundMedial patellofemoral ligament reconstruction and tibial tuberosity anteromedialization are common treatment options for recurrent lateral patellar instability, although ligament reconstruction is not commonly applied to knees with lateral malalignment.

methodsMultibody dynamic simulation was used to assess knee function following tibial tuberosity anteromedialization and medial patellofemoral ligament reconstruction for knees with lateral malalignment. Dual limb squatting was simulated with six models representing knees being treated for patellar instability with an elevated tibial tuberosity to trochlear groove distance. The patellar tendon attachment on the tibia was shifted medially (10 mm) and anteriorly (5 mm) to represent tibial tuberosity anteromedialization. A hamstrings tendon graft was represented for medial patellofemoral ligament reconstruction. Patellar tracking was quantified based on bisect offset index. The patellofemoral contact pressure distribution was quantified using discrete element analysis. Data were analyzed with repeated measures comparisons with post-hoc tests.

findingsBoth procedures significantly reduced bisect offset index, primarily at low flexion angles. The decrease was larger for tibial tuberosity anteromedialization, peaking at 0.18. Tibial tuberosity anteromedialization shifted contact pressures medially, significantly increasing the maximum medial contact pressure at multiple flexion angles, with the maximum pressure increasing up to 1 MPa.

interpretationThe results indicate tibial tuberosity anteromedialization decreases lateral patellar maltracking more effectively than medial patellofemoral ligament reconstruction, but shifts contact pressure medially. Tibial tuberosity anteromedialization is likely to reduce the risk of post-operative instability compared to medial patellofemoral ligament reconstruction. The medial shift in the pressure distribution should be considered for knees with medial cartilage lesions, however.

Indexed as

Computer SimulationPlastic Surgery ProceduresBiomechanical PhenomenaBone NeoplasmsFemaleHumansJoint InstabilityLigaments, ArticularMalePatellofemoral JointTibiaCartilage pressureMedial patellofemoral ligament reconstructionPatellar instabilityPatellar trackingTibial tuberosity anteromedialization

Identifiers

PMID32171152
PMCPMC7225030
OpenAlexW3003417757

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.