Evidence map›Paper›PMID 32171051›Full record

ArticleMolecular oncology2020

Improved prognostication of glioblastoma beyond molecular subtyping by transcriptional profiling of the tumor microenvironment.

Marine Jeanmougin, Annette B Håvik, Lina Cekaite, Petter Brandal, Anita Sveen, Torstein R Meling, Trude H Ågesen, David Scheie, Sverre Heim, Ragnhild A Lothe and 1 more

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Molecular oncology, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 20 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
20citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

20 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Review
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Review
  9. Article
  10. Review
  11. Clinical Medicine Insights. Oncology · 2022
    Article
  12. Review
  13. Electrotherapies for Glioblastoma.Advanced science (Weinheim, Baden-Wurttemberg, Germany) · 2021
    Review
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Review
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Review
  20. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

11 authors.

Marine JeanmouginDepartment of Molecular Oncology, Institute for Cancer Research, Oslo University Hospital - The Norwegian Radium Hospital, Oslo, Norway.
Annette B HåvikDepartment of Molecular Oncology, Institute for Cancer Research, Oslo University Hospital - The Norwegian Radium Hospital, Oslo, Norway.
Lina CekaiteDepartment of Molecular Oncology, Institute for Cancer Research, Oslo University Hospital - The Norwegian Radium Hospital, Oslo, Norway.
Petter BrandalDepartment of Oncology, Oslo University Hospital - The Norwegian Radium Hospital, Oslo, Norway.
Anita SveenDepartment of Molecular Oncology, Institute for Cancer Research, Oslo University Hospital - The Norwegian Radium Hospital, Oslo, Norway.
Torstein R MelingDepartment of Neurosurgery, Oslo University Hospital - Rikshospitalet, Oslo, Norway.
Trude H ÅgesenDepartment of Molecular Oncology, Institute for Cancer Research, Oslo University Hospital - The Norwegian Radium Hospital, Oslo, Norway.
David ScheieDepartment of Pathology, Copenhagen University Hospital - Rigshospitalet, Copenhagen, Denmark.
Sverre HeimSection for Cancer Cytogenetics, Institute for Cancer Genetics and Informatics, Oslo University Hospital - The Norwegian Radium Hospital, Oslo, Norway.
Ragnhild A LotheDepartment of Molecular Oncology, Institute for Cancer Research, Oslo University Hospital - The Norwegian Radium Hospital, Oslo, Norway.
Guro E LindDepartment of Molecular Oncology, Institute for Cancer Research, Oslo University Hospital - The Norwegian Radium Hospital, Oslo, Norway.ORCID 0000-0003-4643-9345

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Glioblastoma (GBM), the most aggressive form of brain cancer, is characterized by a high level of molecular heterogeneity, and infiltration by various immune and stromal cell populations. Important advances have been made in deciphering the microenvironment of GBMs, but its association with existing molecular subtypes and its potential prognostic role remain elusive. We have investigated the abundance of infiltrating immune and stromal cells in silico, from gene expression profiles. Two cohorts, including in-house normal brain and glioma samples (n = 70) and a large sample set from TCGA (n = 393), were combined into a single exploratory dataset. A third independent cohort (n = 124) was used for validation. Tumors were clustered based on their microenvironment infiltration profiles, and associations with known GBM molecular subtypes and patient outcome were tested a posteriori in a multivariable setting. We identified a subset of GBM samples with significantly higher abundances of most immune and stromal cell populations. This subset showed increased expression of both immune suppressor and immune effector genes compared to other GBMs and was enriched for the mesenchymal molecular subtype. Survival analyses suggested that tumor microenvironment infiltration pattern was an independent prognostic factor for GBM patients. Among all, patients with the mesenchymal subtype with low immune and stromal infiltration had the poorest survival. By combining molecular subtyping with gene expression measures of tumor infiltration, the present work contributes with improving prognostic models in GBM.

Indexed as

AdultAgedAged, 80 and overB-LymphocytesBrain NeoplasmsCD8-Positive T-LymphocytesCohort StudiesComputer SimulationDatabases, GeneticFemaleGene Expression Regulation, NeoplasticGlioblastomaHumansKaplan-Meier EstimateKiller Cells, NaturalMaleglioblastomainfiltrationmicroenvironmentstratificationsurvival

Identifiers

PMID32171051
PMCPMC7191188

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.