ReviewDevelopment, growth & differentiation2020
Evolution of wing pigmentation in Drosophila: Diversity, physiological regulation, and cis-regulatory evolution.
Review in Development, growth & differentiation, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 10 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
10 citing papers in PubMed.
- Draft hybrid assembly and annotation of the Drosophila palustris and Drosophila subpalustris genomes.G3 (Bethesda, Md.) · 2026Article
- Wing spot in a tropical and a temperate drosophilid: C = C enrichment and conserved thermal response.BMC ecology and evolution · 2025Article
- Article
- Morphogens in the evolution of size, shape and patterning.Development (Cambridge, England) · 2024Review
- Investigating the phylogenetic history of toxin tolerance in mushroom-feedingEcology and evolution · 2023Article
- Thermal plasticity of wing size and wing spot size in Drosophila guttifera.Development genes and evolution · 2023Article
- Developmental Robustness: The Haltere Case inFrontiers in cell and developmental biology · 2021Article
- Review
- Evolution of wing pigmentation in Drosophila: Diversity, physiological regulation, and cis-regulatory evolution.Development, growth & differentiation · 2020Review
- The Making of TransgenicMethods and protocols · 2020Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
1 author.
Funding
Abstract
Fruit flies (Drosophila and its close relatives, or "drosophilids") are a group that includes an important model organism, Drosophila melanogaster, and also very diverse species distributed worldwide. Many of these species have black or brown pigmentation patterns on their wings, and have been used as material for evo-devo research. Pigmentation patterns are thought to have evolved rapidly compared with body plans or body shapes; hence they are advantageous model systems for studying evolutionary gains of traits and parallel evolution. Various groups of drosophilids, including genus Idiomyia (Hawaiian Drosophila), have a variety of pigmentations, ranging from simple black pigmentations around crossveins to a single antero-distal spot and a more complex mottled pattern. Pigmentation patterns are sometimes obviously used for sexual displays; however, in some cases they may have other functions. The process of wing formation in Drosophila, the general mechanism of pigmentation formation, and the transport of substances necessary for pigmentation, including melanin precursors, through wing veins are summarized here. Lastly, the evolution of the expression of genes regulating pigmentation patterns, the role of cis-regulatory regions, and the conditions required for the evolutionary emergence of pigmentation patterns are discussed. Future prospects for research on the evolution of wing pigmentation pattern formation in drosophilids are presented, particularly from the point of view of how they compare with other studies of the evolution of new traits.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.