Evidence map›Paper›PMID 32170991›Full record

ArticleJournal of applied clinical medical physics2020

Set-up error and dosimetric analysis of HexaPOD evo RT 6D couch combined with cone beam CT image-guided intensity-modulated radiotherapy for primary malignant tumor of the cervical spine.

Ping Jiang, Xile Zhang, Shuhua Wei, Tiandi Zhao, Junjie Wang

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of applied clinical medical physics, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
6citing papers in PubMed
1.0field-weighted citation impact, top 26% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

6 citing papers in PubMed, 10 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Trial
  2. Trial
  3. Article
  4. Assessment of dosimetric impact of interfractional 6D setup error in tongue cancer treated with IMRT and VMAT using daily kV-CBCT.Reports of practical oncology and radiotherapy : journal of Greatpoland Cancer Center in Poznan and Polish Society of Radiation Oncology · 2023
    Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Ping JiangDepartment of Radiation Oncology, Peking University 3rd Hospital, Beijing, 100191, China.
Xile ZhangDepartment of Radiation Oncology, Peking University 3rd Hospital, Beijing, 100191, China.
Shuhua WeiDepartment of Radiation Oncology, Peking University 3rd Hospital, Beijing, 100191, China.
Tiandi ZhaoDepartment of Radiation Oncology, Peking University 3rd Hospital, Beijing, 100191, China.
Junjie WangDepartment of Radiation Oncology, Peking University 3rd Hospital, Beijing, 100191, China.
Peking University Third Hospital · CNPeking University · CN

Funding

National Natural Science Foundation of China 61631001
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

purposeTo investigate the set-up error and consequent dosimetric change in HexaPOD evo RT 6D couch under image-guided intensity-modulated radiotherapy (IG-IMRT) for primary malignant tumor of the cervical spine.

methodsTen cases with primary malignant tumor of the cervical spine were treated with intensity-modulated radiotherapy (IMRT) in our hospital from August 2013 to November 2014. The X-ray volumetric images (XVI) were scanned and obtained by cone-beam CT (CBCT). The six directions (6D) of set-up errors of translation and rotation were obtained by planned CT image registration. HexaPOD evo RT 6D couch made online correction of the set-up error, and then the CBCT was conducted to obtain the residual error.

resultsWe performed set-up error and dosimetric analysis. First, for the set-up error analysis, the average error in three translation directions of 6D set-up error of the primary tumor of the cervical spine was <2 mm, whereas the single maximum error (absolute value) is 7.0 mm. Among average errors of rotation direction, Rotation X (RX) direction 0.67° ± 0.04°, Rotation Y (RY) direction 1.06° ± 0.06°, Rotation Z (RZ) direction 0.78° ± 0.05°; and the single maximum error in three rotation directions were 2.8°, 3.8°, and 2.9°, respectively. On three directions (X, Y, Z axis), the extended distance from clinical target volume (CTV) to planning target volume (PTV) was 3.45, 3.17, and 3.90 mm by calculating, respectively. Then, for the dosimetric analysis, the parameters, including plan sum PTV D98 and D95, planning gross tumor volume D98 and D95, V100% of the plan sum were significantly lower than the treatment plan. Moreover, Dmax of the spinal cord was significantly higher than the treatment plan.

conclusion6D set-up error correction system should be used for accurate position calibration of precise radiotherapy for patients with malignant tumor of the cervical spine.

Indexed as

Cone-Beam Computed TomographyRadiotherapy Setup ErrorsAdolescentAdultBone NeoplasmsCervical VertebraeChordomaHumansMiddle AgedOsteosarcomaPostoperative PeriodRadiometryRadiotherapy DosageRadiotherapy, Intensity-ModulatedRadiotherapy Planning, Computer-AssistedReproducibility of Resultscervical spinal tumordosimetric analysisIMRT

Identifiers

PMID32170991
PMCPMC7170283
OpenAlexW3011433712

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.