Evidence map›Paper›PMID 32170883›Full record

ReviewJournal of leukocyte biology2020

Harnessing neoantigen specific CD4 T cells for cancer immunotherapy.

Spencer E Brightman, Martin S Naradikian, Aaron M Miller, Stephen P Schoenberger

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Journal of leukocyte biology, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 44 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
44citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

44 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Review
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. Review
  6. Article
  7. Review
  8. The spontaneous neoantigen-specific CD4Journal for immunotherapy of cancer · 2025
    Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Review
  12. Article
  13. Using the Cancer Epitope Database and Analysis Resource (CEDAR).Methods in molecular biology (Clifton, N.J.) · 2025
    Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Review
  19. Article
  20. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Spencer E BrightmanLa Jolla Institute for Immunology, La Jolla, California, USA.
Martin S NaradikianLa Jolla Institute for Immunology, La Jolla, California, USA.
Aaron M MillerLa Jolla Institute for Immunology, La Jolla, California, USA.
Stephen P SchoenbergerLa Jolla Institute for Immunology, La Jolla, California, USA.

Funding

Stimulating Neo-Antigen Specific T Cell Responses in Head and Neck CancersU01DE028227 · NIDCR · LA JOLLA INSTITUTE FOR IMMUNOLOGY · PI GUTKIND, JORGE SILVIO, RAO, ANJANA · 2018 to 2022
$4.6M
NIDCR NIH HHS U01 DE028227
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The goal of precision immunotherapy is to direct a patient's T cell response against the immunogenic mutations expressed on their tumors. Most immunotherapy approaches to-date have focused on MHC class I-restricted peptide epitopes by which cytotoxic CD8

Indexed as

ImmunotherapyAnimalsAntigens, NeoplasmCancer VaccinesCD4-Positive T-LymphocytesHumansNeoplasmsT-Lymphocytes, Helper-InducerAntigens, NeoplasmCancer Vaccinesadoptive cell therapycancer vaccinesimmune checkpoint blockadeneoantigens

Identifiers

PMID32170883
PMCPMC7793607

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.