Evidence map›Paper›PMID 32170859›Full record

ArticleJournal of biomedical optics2020

Multispectral singlet oxygen and photosensitizer luminescence dosimeter for continuous photodynamic therapy dose assessment during treatment.

Tobias J Moritz, Youbo Zhao, Michael F Hinds, Jason R Gunn, Jennifer R Shell, Brian W Pogue, Steven J Davis

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of biomedical optics, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 12 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
12citing papers in PubMed
1.5field-weighted citation impact, top 15% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

12 citing papers in PubMed, 21 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Review
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Review
  6. Article
  7. Review
  8. Effect of intermittency factor on singlet oxygen and PGEBiochemistry and biophysics reports · 2022
    Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Multispectral singlet oxygen luminescent dosimetry (MSOLD) for Photofrin-mediated Photodynamic Therapy.Proceedings of SPIE--the International Society for Optical Engineering
    Article
  12. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Tobias J MoritzPhysical Sciences Inc., Andover, Massachusetts, United States.
Youbo ZhaoPhysical Sciences Inc., Andover, Massachusetts, United States.
Michael F HindsPhysical Sciences Inc., Andover, Massachusetts, United States.
Jason R GunnThayer School of Engineering at Dartmouth, Hanover, New Hampshire, United States.
Jennifer R ShellThayer School of Engineering at Dartmouth, Hanover, New Hampshire, United States.
Brian W PogueThayer School of Engineering at Dartmouth, Hanover, New Hampshire, United States.
Steven J DavisPhysical Sciences Inc., Andover, Massachusetts, United States.
Physical Sciences (United States) · USDartmouth College · US

Funding

Translational Engineering in Cancer (TEC)P30CA023108 · NCI · DARTMOUTH COLLEGE · PI Fred W Kolling IV · 1985 to 2026
$91.3M
Small Molecule Enhancers of Photodynamic Therapy for Skin CancerP01CA084203 · NCI · MASSACHUSETTS GENERAL HOSPITAL · PI Brian William Pogue · 2001 to 2026
$27.9M
Optical Dosimeter-guided Photodynamic TherapyR44CA213607 · NCI · PHYSICAL SCIENCES, INC · PI ZHAO, YOUBO · 2018 to 2019
$1.2M
NCI NIH HHS P01 CA084203NCI NIH HHS P30 CA023108NCI NIH HHS R44 CA213607
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

significancePhotodynamic therapy (PDT) involves complex light-drug-pathophysiology interactions that can be affected by multiple parameters and often leads to large variations in treatment outcome from patient to patient. Direct PDT dosimetry technologies have been sought to optimize the control variables (e.g., light dose, drug administration, tissue oxygenation, and patient conditioning) for best patient outcomes. In comparison, singlet oxygen (O21) dosimetry has been tested in various forms to provide an accurate and perhaps comprehensive prediction of the treatment efficacy.

aimWe discuss an advanced version of this approach provided by a noninvasive, continuous wave dosimeter that can measure near-infrared spectrally resolved luminescence of both photosensitizer (PS) and O21 generated during PDT cancer treatment. APPROACH: This dosimetry technology uses an amplified, high quantum efficiency InGaAs detector with spectroscopic decomposition during the light treatment to continuously extract the maximum signal of O21 phosphorescence while suppressing the strong PS luminescence background by spectrally fitting the data points across nine narrow band wavelengths. O21 and PS luminescence signals were measured in vivo in FaDu xenograft tumors grown in mice during PDT treatment using Verteporfin as the PS and a continuous laser treatment at 690 nm wavelength.

resultsA cohort of 19 mice was used and observations indicate that the tumor growth rate inhibition showed a stronger correlation with O21 than with just the PS signal.

conclusionsThese results suggest that O21 measurement may be a more direct dosimeter of PDT damage, and it has potential value as a definitive diagnostic for PDT treatment, especially with spectral separation of the background luminescence and online estimation of the PS concentration.

Indexed as

PhotochemotherapyPhotosensitizing AgentsAnimalsHumansLuminescenceMiceRadiation DosimetersSinglet OxygenPhotosensitizing AgentsSinglet Oxygendosephotodynamic therapysinglet oxygenspectroscopytumor regrowth

Identifiers

PMID32170859
PMCPMC7068220
OpenAlexW3012288031

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.