Evidence map›Paper›PMID 32170633›Full record

ArticleJournal of neuro-oncology2020

Reciprocal control of ADAM17/EGFR/Akt signaling and miR-145 drives GBM invasiveness.

Yuduo Guo, Xin He, Mingshan Zhang, Yanming Qu, Chunyu Gu, Ming Ren, Haoran Wang, Weihai Ning, Junfa Li, Chunjiang Yu and 1 more

Abstract read
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of neuro-oncology, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 11 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
11citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
0.9field-weighted citation impact, top 27% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

11 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 14 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. ADAM10 and ADAM17-Novel Players in Retinoblastoma Carcinogenesis.International journal of molecular sciences · 2022
    Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Review
  9. Genetic Variations ofPharmacogenomics and personalized medicine · 2022
    Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

11 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Yuduo GuoDepartment of Neurosurgery, Sanbo Brain Hospital, Capital Medical University, Beijing, 100093, People's Republic of China.
Xin HeDepartment of Neurosurgery, Sanbo Brain Hospital, Capital Medical University, Beijing, 100093, People's Republic of China.
Mingshan ZhangDepartment of Neurosurgery, Sanbo Brain Hospital, Capital Medical University, Beijing, 100093, People's Republic of China.
Yanming QuDepartment of Neurosurgery, Sanbo Brain Hospital, Capital Medical University, Beijing, 100093, People's Republic of China.
Chunyu GuDepartment of Neurosurgery, Sanbo Brain Hospital, Capital Medical University, Beijing, 100093, People's Republic of China.
Ming RenDepartment of Neurosurgery, Sanbo Brain Hospital, Capital Medical University, Beijing, 100093, People's Republic of China.
Haoran WangDepartment of Neurosurgery, Sanbo Brain Hospital, Capital Medical University, Beijing, 100093, People's Republic of China.
Weihai NingDepartment of Neurosurgery, Sanbo Brain Hospital, Capital Medical University, Beijing, 100093, People's Republic of China.
Junfa LiDepartment of Neurobiology and Center of Stroke, Beijing Institute for Brain Disorders, Capital Medical University, Beijing, 100069, People's Republic of China.
Chunjiang YuDepartment of Neurosurgery, Sanbo Brain Hospital, Capital Medical University, Beijing, 100093, People's Republic of China.
Hongwei ZhangDepartment of Neurosurgery, Sanbo Brain Hospital, Capital Medical University, Beijing, 100093, People's Republic of China. 62856705@163.com.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-6315-9997
Capital Medical University · CN

Funding

Beijing Natural Science Foundation Program and Scientific Research Key Program of Beijing Municipal Commission of Education KZ201510025030
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

introductionGlioblastoma multiforme (GBM) is one of the most devastating brain malignancies worldwide and is considered to be incurable. However, the mechanisms underlying its aggressiveness remain unclear.

methodsThe expression of ADAM17 in tissue samples was detected by immunohistochemistry. Knockdown and rescue experiments were used to demonstrate the regulatory effect of ADAM17 on the invasion ability of GBM cells. Western Blot and qPCR were used to detect the expression of related proteins and RNAs. Moreover, a luciferase reporter assay was performed to verify whether miR-145 directly binds to the 3'-UTR of ADAM17.

resultsWe revealed that ADAM17 was overexpressed in GBM tissues and correlated positively with poor prognosis. The knockdown of ADAM17 obviously suppressed the invasiveness of GBM cell lines. Furthermore, we found that knockdown of ADAM17 decreased activation of EGFR/Akt/C/EBP-β signaling, and consequently upregulated miR-145 expression in GBM cell lines. Notably, miR-145 directly targeted the ADAM17 3'-UTR and suppressed expression levels of ADAM17.

conclusionsOur findings define an ADAM17/EGFR/miR-145 feedback loop that drives the GBM invasion. Reciprocal regulation between ADAM17 and miR-145 results in aberrant activation of EGFR signaling, suggesting that inhibition of ADAM17 expression can be an ideal therapeutic strategy for the treatment of GBM.

Indexed as

ADAM17 ProteinApoptosisBiomarkers, TumorBrain NeoplasmsCell MovementCell ProliferationErbB ReceptorsGene Expression Regulation, NeoplasticGlioblastomaHumansMicroRNAsNeoplasm InvasivenessPrognosisProto-Oncogene Proteins c-aktSurvival RateTumor Cells, CulturedADAM17 ProteinADAM17 protein, humanBiomarkers, TumorEGFR protein, humanErbB ReceptorsMicroRNAsMIRN145 microRNA, humanProto-Oncogene Proteins c-akt

Identifiers

PMID32170633
OpenAlexW3011953273

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.