ArticleUpdates in surgery2020
Hemocoagulative post-operative changes after laparoscopic surgery compared to open surgery: the role of lupus anticoagulant.
Article in Updates in surgery, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
4 citing papers in PubMed, 2 citations in OpenAlex.
- Perioperative management and challenges of robotic-assisted surgery: a narrative review.Journal of robotic surgery · 2026Review
- Gasless single-port retroperitoneal laparoscopic adrenalectomy: a novel option for adrenal tumors.Translational andrology and urology · 2026Article
- Laparoscopic surgery: A randomised controlled trial comparing intraoperative hemodynamic parameters and arterial-blood gas changes at two different pneumoperitoneal pressure values.Annals of medicine and surgery (2012) · 2022Article
- Hemocoagulative Modifications after Laparoscopic Surgery at Different Pneumoperitoneum Pressure Settings.International journal of surgery protocols · 2022Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
Abstract
Although still debated, post-operative modification of hemostasis seems to be less pronounced after laparoscopy compared to open surgery. Antiphospholipid antibodies might play a role in the post-operative thromboembolic risk, although their evaluation in surgical patients has never been performed. Post-operative modification of antiphospholipid antibodies could be related to the surgical approach (laparoscopic or open). In this prospective study, the authors statistically compared the pre-operative values and post-operative modification of antiphospholipid antibodies in two homogeneous groups of patients operated on by laparoscopic and open surgery. No statistical differences within each group and between the two groups were shown comparing mean values of pre-operative and post-operative antiphospholipid antibodies. In the open group, there was a significant difference between pre-operative and post-operative LAC means (P < 0.01). In the laparoscopic group, on the contrary, no significant change in LAC values between pre- and post-operative tests (P = 0.55) was observed. Since LAC could be related to coagulation disorders, this study seems to support that laparoscopic surgery might induce a less risk of post-operative thromboembolic disease.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.