ArticleJapanese journal of radiology2020
Detectability of the artery of Adamkiewicz on computed tomography angiography of the aorta by using ultra-high-resolution computed tomography.
Article in Japanese journal of radiology, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 13 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
13 citing papers in PubMed.
- How we do it: artery of Adamkiewicz evaluation by CTA in children.Pediatric radiology · 2026Article
- Morphology-based radiological-histological correlation on ultra-high-resolution energy-integrating detector CT using cadaveric human lungs: nodule and airway analysis.European radiology · 2025Article
- Does computed tomography angiography for the Adamkiewicz artery add value over standard scanning in thoracic endovascular aortic repair planning?JTCVS structural and endovascular · 2025Article
- Investigation of abdominal artery delineation by photon-counting detector CT.La Radiologia medica · 2024Article
- Improvement of Neurovascular Imaging Using Ultra-High-Resolution Computed Tomography Angiography.Clinical neuroradiology · 2024Article
- Effect of Low Tube Voltage (100 kV) Combined with ASIR-V on the Visualization and Image Quality of the Adamkiewicz Artery: A Comparison with 120 kV Protocol.Diagnostics (Basel, Switzerland) · 2023Article
- Preoperative Spinal Angiography for Thoracic Neuroblastoma: Impact of Identification of the Adamkiewicz Artery on Gross Total Resection and Neurological Sequelae.Children (Basel, Switzerland) · 2023Article
- Impact of a new deep-learning-based reconstruction algorithm on image quality in ultra-high-resolution CT: clinical observational and phantom studies.The British journal of radiology · 2023Article
- Postpartum Spinal Cord Infarction: A Case Report and Review of the Literature.Medicines (Basel, Switzerland) · 2022Article
- Influence of monitor display resolution and displayed image size on the spatial resolution of ultra-high-resolution CT images: a phantom study.Radiological physics and technology · 2022Article
- Novel Intraoperative Navigation Using Ultra-High-Resolution CT in Robot-Assisted Partial Nephrectomy.Cancers · 2022Article
- Deep learning-based and hybrid-type iterative reconstructions for CT: comparison of capability for quantitative and qualitative image quality improvements and small vessel evaluation at dynamic CE-abdominal CT with ultra-high and standard resolutions.Japanese journal of radiology · 2021Article
- On the Role and Effects of Uncertainties in CardiovascularFrontiers in medical technology · 2021Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
9 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
purposeTo evaluate the detectability of AKA on aortic computed tomography angiography (CTA) using ultra-high-resolution computed tomography (UHRCT). MATERIALS AND
methodsTwenty-eight patients were enrolled. They underwent aortic CTA with UHRCT (UHRCTA) and had previously undergone aortic conventional CTA (CCTA). The injection protocol of UHRCTA was the same as that of CCTA. The bolus tracking technique was used. UHRCTA images were reconstructed with adaptive iterative dose reduction (strong) and with forward-projected model-based iterative reconstruction solution. The matrix size and slice thickness on UHRCT were 1024 and 0.25 mm, respectively, and those on conventional CT were 512 and 0.5 or 0.67 mm, respectively. The UHRCTA and CCTA images were visually compared by using four scales. A score of 4 or 3 indicated that the AKA was assessable. In this instance, the contrast-to-noise ratios of each UHRCTA were measured. The exposure dose and signal-to-noise ratios were also investigated.
resultsThe AKA visualization scores obtained with UHRCTA with forward-projected model-based iterative reconstruction solution were significantly higher than those with adaptive iterative dose reduction (p = 0.018) and CCTA (p = 0.0024).
conclusionUHRCT can contribute to the better visualization of the AKA on aortic CTA.
Indexed as
Identifiers
32170567What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.