Evidence map›Paper›PMID 32170566›Full record

ArticleSurgical endoscopy2020

Robotic treatment for urinary tract endometriosis: preliminary results and surgical details in a high-volume single-Institutional cohort study.

Fabrizio Di Maida, Andrea Mari, Simone Morselli, Riccardo Campi, Simone Sforza, Andrea Cocci, Riccardo Tellini, Agostino Tuccio, Felice Petraglia, Lorenzo Masieri and 2 more

Abstract readEvaluation Study
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in Surgical endoscopy, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
6citing papers in PubMed
1.6field-weighted citation impact, top 17% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

6 citing papers in PubMed, 17 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Urinary tract endometriosis: Revisiting the definition of ureterolysis.International journal of gynaecology and obstetrics: the official organ of the International Federation of Gynaecology and Obstetrics · 2026
    Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. Review
  6. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

12 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Fabrizio Di MaidaDepartment of Urology, University of Florence, Unit of Oncologic Minimally-Invasive Urology and Andrology, Careggi University Hospital, San Luca Nuovo, Florence, Italy.
Andrea MariDepartment of Urology, University of Florence, Unit of Oncologic Minimally-Invasive Urology and Andrology, Careggi University Hospital, San Luca Nuovo, Florence, Italy.
Simone MorselliDepartment of Urology, University of Florence, Unit of Oncologic Minimally-Invasive Urology and Andrology, Careggi University Hospital, San Luca Nuovo, Florence, Italy.
Riccardo CampiDepartment of Urology, University of Florence, Unit of Oncologic Minimally-Invasive Urology and Andrology, Careggi University Hospital, San Luca Nuovo, Florence, Italy.
Simone SforzaDepartment of Urology, University of Florence, Unit of Oncologic Minimally-Invasive Urology and Andrology, Careggi University Hospital, San Luca Nuovo, Florence, Italy.
Andrea CocciDepartment of Urology, University of Florence, Unit of Oncologic Minimally-Invasive Urology and Andrology, Careggi University Hospital, San Luca Nuovo, Florence, Italy.
Riccardo TelliniDepartment of Urology, University of Florence, Unit of Oncologic Minimally-Invasive Urology and Andrology, Careggi University Hospital, San Luca Nuovo, Florence, Italy.
Agostino TuccioDepartment of Urology, University of Florence, Unit of Oncologic Minimally-Invasive Urology and Andrology, Careggi University Hospital, San Luca Nuovo, Florence, Italy.
Felice PetragliaDepartment of Gynecology and Obstestrics, University of Florence, Careggi Hospital, Florence, Italy.
Lorenzo MasieriDepartment of Urology, University of Florence, Unit of Oncologic Minimally-Invasive Urology and Andrology, Careggi University Hospital, San Luca Nuovo, Florence, Italy.
Marco CariniDepartment of Urology, University of Florence, Unit of Oncologic Minimally-Invasive Urology and Andrology, Careggi University Hospital, San Luca Nuovo, Florence, Italy.
Andrea MinerviniDepartment of Urology, University of Florence, Unit of Oncologic Minimally-Invasive Urology and Andrology, Careggi University Hospital, San Luca Nuovo, Florence, Italy. andreamine@libero.it.
University of Florence · IT

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundAim of the study was to present the surgical techniques and the postoperative outcomes in women treated with robotic excision for deep endometriosis involving the urinary tract. MATERIALS AND

methodsWe retrospectively reviewed the prospectively recorded clinical data of women consecutively undergoing minimally invasive treatment for complex endometriosis involving urinary tract in our center between January 2012 and June 2018. All the patients received a preoperative multidisciplinary evaluation with the general surgeon, the gynecologist and the urologist due to the frequent concomitant involvement of bowel and genital system. Patients undergoing robotic surgery were treated with the Si or Xi da Vinci surgical system.

resultsA total of 74 consecutive patients were enrolled. Twenty-eight (37.8%) patients underwent conventional laparoscopy and 46 (62.2%) robotic surgery. Only patients treated with robotic approach were considered for the final analyses. Overall, 17 (36.9%) patients were treated with partial cystectomy, 13 (28.3%) with ureteral reimplantation, 10 (21.7%) patients were treated with ureteral lysis, 4 (8.7%) with removal of bladder endometrial node without opening the mucosa layer and 2 (4.3%) with ureteral end-to-end anastomosis. Concomitant involvement of bowel and genital system was registered in 14 (30.4%) and 32 (69.5%) patients, respectively. No conversions to laparotomy were recorded. Overall, 5 (10.9%) patients experienced postoperative complications, of which only one was a major complication (Clavien 3b). At a median follow-up of 31.3 (IQR 17.6-43.3) months, 4 (8.7%) patients experienced disease recurrence at the level of urinary tract.

conclusionsRobotic excision of urological endometriosis represents a safe and effective treatment option, since a limited rate of surgical complications was recorded even in cases of multi-organ disease.

Indexed as

AdultAnastomosis, SurgicalCohort StudiesCystectomyEndometriosisFemaleHumansLaparoscopyMiddle AgedPostoperative ComplicationsProspective StudiesRetrospective StudiesRobotic Surgical ProceduresTreatment OutcomeUreterUrinary BladderEndometriosisMinimally-invasiveRoboticUrological

Identifiers

PMID32170566
OpenAlexW3011528427

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.