Evidence map›Paper›PMID 32170498›Full record

ReviewInsights into imaging2020

Electronic cleansing of tagged residue in CT colonography: what radiologists need to know.

Thomas Mang, Christian Bräuer, Stefaan Gryspeerdt, Martina Scharitzer, Helmut Ringl, Philippe Lefere

Open access · goldAbstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Insights into imaging, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
3citing papers in PubMed
0.3field-weighted citation impact, top 44% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

3 citing papers in PubMed, 10 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Observational
  2. Article
  3. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors at 3 institutions in 2 countries.

Thomas MangDepartment of Biomedical Imaging and Image-guided Therapy, Medical University of Vienna, Währinger Gürtel 18-20, A-1090, Vienna, Austria. thomas.mang@meduniwien.ac.at.
Christian BräuerDepartment of Biomedical Imaging and Image-guided Therapy, Medical University of Vienna, Währinger Gürtel 18-20, A-1090, Vienna, Austria.
Stefaan GryspeerdtDepartment of Radiology, AZ Delta, Bruggesteenweg 90, B-8800, Roeselare, Belgium.
Martina ScharitzerDepartment of Biomedical Imaging and Image-guided Therapy, Medical University of Vienna, Währinger Gürtel 18-20, A-1090, Vienna, Austria.
Helmut RinglDepartment of Radiology, Danube Hospital Vienna, Langobardenstrasse 122, A-1220, Wien, Austria.
Philippe LefereDepartment of Radiology, AZ Delta, Bruggesteenweg 90, B-8800, Roeselare, Belgium.
Medical University of Vienna · ATAZ Delta · BEUniversität für Weiterbildung Krems · AT

Funding

Medical Scientific Fund of the Mayor of the City of Vienna 15154
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

CT colonography (CTC) is the radiological examination of choice for the diagnosis of colorectal neoplasia. Faecal tagging is considered a mandatory part of bowel preparation. However, the colonic mucosa, obscured by tagged residue, is not accessible to endoluminal 3D views and requires time-consuming 2D evaluation. Electronic cleansing (EC) software algorithms can overcome this limitation by digitally subtracting tagged residue from the colonic lumen. Ideally, this enables a seamless 3D endoluminal evaluation. Despite this benefit, EC is a potential source of a wide range of artefacts. Accurate EC requires proper CTC examination technique and faecal tagging. The digital subtraction process has been shown to affect the relevant morphological features of both colonic anatomy and colonic lesions, if submerged under faecal residue. This article summarises the potential effects of EC on CTC imaging, the consequences for reporting and patient management, and strategies to avoid pitfalls. Furthermore, potentially negative effects on clinical reporting and patient management are shown, and problem-solving techniques, as well as recommendations for the appropriate use of EC techniques, are presented. Radiologists using EC should be familiar with EC-related effects on polyp size and also with correct measurement techniques.

Indexed as

Colorectal polypsCT colonographyElectronic cleansingFaecal taggingVirtual colonoscopy

Identifiers

PMID32170498
PMCPMC7070139
OpenAlexW3011650951

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.