Evidence map›Paper›PMID 32170461›Full record

ReviewCurrent oncology reports2020

Redefining the Role of Surgical Management of Metastatic Renal Cell Carcinoma.

Walter R Hsiang, Patrick A Kenney, Michael S Leapman

Abstract readReview
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Review in Current oncology reports, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
3citing papers in PubMed
0.3field-weighted citation impact, top 41% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

3 citing papers in PubMed, 6 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Walter R HsiangYale University School of Medicine, New Haven, USA.
Patrick A KenneyYale University School of Medicine, New Haven, USA.
Michael S LeapmanYale University School of Medicine, New Haven, USA. michael.leapman@yale.edu.
Yale University · US

Funding

Understanding the Adoption and Impact of New Risk Assessment Technologies in Prostate Cancer CareK08CA237872 · NCI · YALE UNIVERSITY · PI LEAPMAN, MICHAEL STUART · 2019 to 2023
$1.1M
NCI NIH HHS K08 CA237872
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

purpose of reviewThe treatment landscape for metastatic renal cell carcinoma (mRCC) continues to evolve with ongoing advancements in systemic therapy, raising further questions about the optimal role of surgery in the management of mRCC. Herein, we provide a context and review of the recent evidence concerning the role of surgical therapy for patients with mRCC including cytoreductive nephrectomy and distant metastatectomy. RECENT

findingsOne randomized trial has been published in the targeted therapy era suggesting that initial systemic therapy is non-inferior to cytoreductive nephrectomy among patients with intermediate and poor-risk mRCC. Delaying cytoreductive nephrectomy until after systemic therapy may be a viable treatment approach, although a high level of evidence is lacking. Additional questions remain regarding the sequence of surgery with systemic therapy, utility of distant metastatectomy, as well as the application of these findings to the current generation of immunotherapy. Recent evidence challenges the need of upfront cytoreductive nephrectomy for unselected patients with mRCC. However, surgical therapy continues to play an important role in the management of the disease.

Indexed as

Carcinoma, Renal CellCytoreduction Surgical ProceduresHumansKidney NeoplasmsMetastasectomyNephrectomyPrognosisRisk FactorsSurvival AnalysisTreatment OutcomeCARMENACytokine therapyCytoreductive nephrectomyImmune checkpoint inhibitorMetastatectomySURTIMETargeted therapy

Identifiers

PMID32170461
OpenAlexW3011204730

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.